Pillar of Salt

.

—Pillar of salt.

Walker thinks.

If he turns around, she will turn into a pillar of salt.

No, that isn’t it. She will disappear.

Or will he disappear?

Or will they both?

What has put this thought in his head?

A detail from something he once heard, but he can’t remember how it goes. It is hard to keep straight what you were told at church as a kid from what you learned at school. It is hard to keep anything straight anymore—but damn, she is doing it again! Julia is lagging behind him, she has let him go ahead, in the mall, by himself!

It is Tuesday, they went out to eat. Lisa, their daughter, fifteen, who hasn’t yet fleshed out into their expectations, is off somewhere for the night with other girls in the neighborhood about whom they have no opinion. They only see friends on weekends, and have no plans for the one coming up. Julia didn’t want to stay at the restaurant for a few more drinks. Walker didn’t want to go to a movie. Neither wanted to go home. They settled on the mall.

What else is there to do?

Walker asks himself.

But Walker does not like malls. The massive columns painted in pastel colors, the quiet expanse of concrete floating over walls of glass, a gushing fountain, the sedative music he can barely hear—it is all irritating. And there is something pointless and vaguely illicit in going out in the middle of the week, the pointlessness multiplied into something else, large and disturbing, by the low, complex murmur of the voice of shoppers that settles over him like a heavy fog. The mall is crowded, two tiers full. People Walker does not know and does not want to know, who assault him at every step. They look on edge, predatory. Consumers consuming. Watchers, gawkers gawking, watching. Walker is getting edgy himself.

And Julia is somewhere behind him in all this noise, taking, he is sure, short, mincing steps.

—Pillar of salt.

Not that she is delicate, though he feels she sometimes affects this manner for her purposes. Or slow. When they first got together, at the university, they would go for long hikes in the Berkeley Hills. Then she marched at a brisk, vigorous pace, competing for the lead, and he’d let her go by, liked to watch her as she passed, Julia, being Julia, moving ahead. Love with Julia was sudden and frank, a postulate, not a posture, not a pose.

But after they had been married for a while, when they were out in public places, she began to slow down and let him keep walking until he left her some distance behind—until he realized he had left her behind. Then he had to stop and wait for her to catch up, or she stopped and stood waiting, and he had to go back until they were together again. It was her way of letting him know that he walked too fast, that he had stretched the invisible tether of their relationship.

Was being headstrong.

Or insensitive.

Or blind.

Or some such offense. She never explained. There was only that look on her face, at once a shrinking from injury, a flash of wordless anger, a look gone too soon for him to ask, leaving him guessing what was wrong. Walker did not expect miracles when he got married, but he thought when you took this step you might at least be able to put some of the nonsense in life aside.

—Pillar of salt.

Yet now it is just something she does, a gesture become habit, whose meaning has faded with repetition, with years of married life. Her eyes, not quite gray or green, opened so her irises are rimmed with white, stare through you without recognition, and the look has blurred into an expression too indistinct for Walker to describe.

—Not pillar of salt. Disappear.

Walker may be given to moments of abstraction, when he is absorbed in the progress of some thought and loses track of where he is, but he sees nothing in this behavior that should disturb her.

Worse, that she has to stage a demonstration to make a point. Matters important enough for gesture should find language, words that are succinct and clear. If you have something on your mind, you should say it, not let it fester. It is the unsaid that leads to fights, to harm.

Even worse, to act this way but forget why—which she seems to have done, which is something she does, forget things, she forgets things all the time—and not be aware she still does it, letting him go ahead, leaving him exposed before strangers, before strangers at a mall, keeping him in the eye of judgment, as if putting him on trial for all to see, as if he were an abuser of women, some callous male supreme, and even if it is only judgment past, maybe judgment gone and judgment only he remembers, it still is judgment, and the judgment of memory is a judgment from which there is no escape—

This is careless!

But what Walker most dislikes is making mountains out of molehills.

Lighten up.

Mellow out.

A mall is just a mall. It is part of the American landscape. It is the fruit of free enterprise. Julia is his wife, and he loves her. They have been married nearly twenty years. Walker, Walker thinks, is Walker. He is a middle manager in a Silicon Valley firm that makes computers, who has never claimed to be anything more or less than what he is. It should be enough, Walker believes, to be who you are. Sometimes it is all you can do.

So Walker reflects: The last few years have not been easy for her, and lately she has seemed adrift. Her career plans are up in the air; Lisa’s at high school, out of the house more often than in. Even Julia’s school—she went back to get a graduate degree—has proven to be a wash. And from the way she stares in the bathroom mirror, she probably thinks her looks have started to go as well. Slogging through your forties must be harder on women than men.

And Walker realizes: Julia is not devious, she is not hysterical. It is not a big deal, what she does, not worth argument. And once together, they start over; their marriage, their life goes on. Besides, if you had to account for everything you said and did—

Turn around. Go back to her.

—Pillar of salt.

Still the sense something will happen to her if he turns around. A foreboding. Not that Walker heeds those voices that sometimes pop into your head with special insistence, as if they could determine the course of your life. All kinds of things run around inside the brain. Yet there are things we hear that stay with, might change us, if we could only sort them out.

—Pillar of salt.

Or perhaps something will happen to him. But it’s a myth, he’s sure of this, probably a Greek myth. A story about metamorphosis, where people change into plants or animals or things.

Which Greek turns back?

Who changes into a pillar of salt?

Not that Walker is superstitious, either. He doesn’t believe that Greeks actually turned into plants or animals or pillars of salt, anymore than he believes anything will actually happen to anyone if he turns around. His beliefs do not have to be confirmed by mysterious events.

—Pillar of salt.

Or is it a Roman myth?

Or a story from the Bible?

And neither do angels hover over Walker’s head, beckoning with songs of bliss, nor demons torment him, trying to drag him down below. We only have each other to look at, ourselves to figure out. He has long since learned to come to terms with the strain religion puts on belief, the props of guilt placed there to give someone else the upper hand.

Still, he doesn’t pretend you can understand everything that goes on inside the head, that all can be explained by reason. He knows that the light of reason also casts shadows. And there has to be something within us and between us, or life would be a hopeless mess. Yet even Protestantism, back in Walnut Creek, was the aspirin pitch of admen, trying not to scare their suburban flocks away. And who else is there to listen to now? Those fundamentalists who have started to run for office, the bogeymen of faith? Or New Age flakes? Or pop psychologists and self-help philosophers, whose advice lasts as long as the sales of their books?

—Pillar of salt.

What’s a myth?

It is something that is not true. But there must be reasons myths have hung around—

Or will something happen to her if he doesn’t turn around?

Or to him?

Is it something he should try to prevent?

What does he believe can happen in the world?

And there must be reasons why it’s hard to get myths right. But Walker is getting confused. It has been a long time since he went to church, was in school.

Keep walking, Walker tells himself. You are not a bad person, he thinks.

Yet all these people at the mall—it is impossible to move forward, much less think straight. He treads on the heels of the slow and aimless while the impetuous shove from behind. Mothers plow through with baby carriages; small children trip on his feet. Everywhere the flow is broken by more people, people going the wrong way, people struck by the urge to go to stores on the other side.

And this mall has gone downhill. One anchor, I. Magnin’s, has pulled out; its windows remain vacant. No more the angular and nervous, yet aloof, yet sublime mannequins in shimmering gold and silver gowns. Macy’s, across the way, is struggling. Sears holds down the fort behind him. Woolworth’s looms ahead. Between them, the little stores that come and go, suing for a piece of your heart, a corner of your wallet:

Plastic furniture and greeting cards.

Sports shoes and software and gourmet cookies.

Jewelry for fingers, necks, wrists, and toes, for pierced ears, lips, noses, and bellies.

This is supposed to be an upscale neighborhood.

Mall arts and crafts, little booths in the walkway, disrupting the flow even more:

Driftwood sculpture and chrome license plate holders.

Stuffed animals in primary hues; exotic animals inlaid in stained wood.

Computer generated pictures, scattered colors, from which a three-dimensional image is supposed to emerge.

A mall, Walker thinks, is a substitute for something else.

A toy store—an arsenal of plastic, fantastic weapons; two aisles for girls, a pink and purple haze.

T-shirts and posters—pictures of sports, movie, and rock stars poised and frozen in a moment of climax; printed slogans that scream at you with their brass, their wit.

Frederick’s of Hollywood—a host of impassive seraphim with frosted hair and glassy stares, steely legs and high, hard breasts, wearing lacy see-through teddies and camisoles trimmed with fluff, and garter belts and mesh stockings, and sheer bras and panties red and black.

Signs of some language Walker does not wish to know. He keeps his arms close to his sides, balancing his composure, his sense of who he is. It is the way he feels every morning when he gets on I-280 to go to work.

A video game arcade—phosphorous monsters, aliens, thugs, and Nazis, and a welter of kids waiting to get at them; the sounds of hands slapping buttons, of shouts of anguish and ecstasy, of mass electronic slaughter.

Perhaps it is he who will disappear.

Or he will turn into a pillar of salt.

Sale signs everywhere. Stores going out of business. Stores reworking their facades with neon lights and fake stone, with classical columns that support nothing—postmodern glitz. Stores boarded up and painted with sentimental pictures of parks and old-time villages, but without indication of what is coming soon. Most of the stores he remembers when they first moved to Menlo Park—real antiques, a bookstore that sold books, a men’s store with clothes he could wear—are gone, and the ones that have replaced them are cheaper:

Budget rugs, Dollar Daze.

Or more gimmicky:

Party gags and novelties.

Gadgets impossibly complex and small.

More singular, more desperate in their appeal:

A store that sells only trolls.

As if the invisible hand has lost its grip.

California has taken several hits the last few years. Defense cuts, the exodus of high-tech, the perennial budget botch in Sacramento. But the Valley has always been overpriced and overgrown. It was only a matter of time. Pundits blame the lean years for their problems, when they should look back to when times were flush. Yet more than this, or less, or not this at all, because he does not think economics fully explains the decline, that what he sees at the mall can be located on the cycle of slumps and booms.

Because while Walker does believe in free enterprise, he doesn’t think anyone has stopped to consider what it can and cannot do, just as he believes in high-tech but does not buy his company’s hype that computers will revolutionize our lives. What matters is what computers process, and will what they process now become better in the future, or even different, or will it just be more of the same, processed faster?

Russian imports.

This was here the last time. Some enterprising émigré has capitalized on the fall of the Soviets. On the shelves, cloisonné boxes, chess sets, and gilt icons. Hanging in the window, hockey jerseys and army uniforms with red stars. On the ledge, rows of those nested dolls, opened and arranged in descending order. Identical peasant girls, large to small, with the same painted cheeks, the same folk smile. Then another set: Yeltsin, Gorbachev, Khrushchev, Stalin, down to a tiny Lenin—

Not smiling.

Nasty business, Walker thinks, what he hears is happening in Russia, in the new republics whose names he has not yet learned. He wonders what those Marxists back at Berkeley think now.

Four years of protests, the burn of egos among palm trees and littered streets—he should have gone to Stanford, or maybe gone East, where he might have belonged, instead. He screwed around for a while because Berkeley was a good place to screw around. Then he turned ascetic when everyone got ascetic, which proved only to be another form of self-indulgence. Then it was time to get serious, but he couldn’t find anything in class to get serious about. Marx, Freud; class oppression, psychic repression—life was one big squeeze. He majored in electrical engineering because the logic of chips gave him some room. And at least there was a kind of music in what ran through the gates of NAND, AND, OR, and NOR; the rest was post-structuralist noise.

Whatever post-structuralism is.

With graduation, the need for pragmatism, a job market that supported little else. Grad school, then, and the trek to the Valley. If you can’t make a good choice, don’t make a dumb one. He wouldn’t do himself or anyone else any good by going broke. But he still tries to keep some sense of culture, some sense of something, which has survived deconstruction by Berkeley profs, that violence of sardonic minds. Because there has to more to our existence than that mechanism which negotiates the distance between our money and our desire. He has seen what has happened to some guys at the office, who can’t even sluice their salaries to women on the side but pour it directly into the pockets of their shrinks.

—Pillar of salt.

We have all lost touch with the Greeks.

Or the Romans.

Or the Christians or the Jews.

It doesn’t matter who turned around or what really happened. It doesn’t matter what is really happening now. To get bogged down in details, to focus on the literal, is to miss some larger point. Long ago, someone actually turned around somewhere, someone saw an actual pillar of salt, was reminded of something that happened, made a connection, told a story, and the story caught on and stayed. It meant something to someone then, it has meant something to us through the ages, and it must mean something to Walker now.

What matters is the point the story tells.

What?

Or maybe someone turned around and saw someone disappear, not really, but in a sense. But then that wouldn’t be metamorphosis.

Or maybe someone turned around, saw a pillar of salt, and disappeared himself, in a sense. But that doesn’t make any sense at all.

Or maybe someone didn’t turn around and something happened to him or to someone else.

Then what?

Whoever it was who saw whatever, whatever it was that happened to him or to someone else, whoever it was who made the story up, Walker decides, he must have been a married man.

What is a pillar of salt, anyway?

What comes after post-structuralism?

Post-post-structuralism?

Clothes.

Little boutiques and huge discount outlets up and down the hall. What the world has revealed to Walker is that most stores at a mall sell clothes.

Clothes in colors that run a ragged spectrum from stark white and black to earthy to fleshy to fluorescents, or colors that do not look like colors, off the scale,

Clothes cut tight cut baggy cut short cut long, the cuts hiding, suggesting, revealing, boasting but not defining what they might dress,

Clothes with pockets that tell us they are pockets, clothes that see no need for their use; clothes with padded shoulders, the statement of a pointed shrug; clothes with lapels that taunt the concept of lapels, lapels thin, evanescent, lapels stately fat,

Plain clothes in natural fibers, affectedly austere; clothes embellished with obvious pleats and stitching, showy sequins and brass studs; brand name clothes branded with the logos of their brands; sports clothes sporting odd prints and loud plaids, abstract patterns chaotic and campy, Fiftyish fatuousness revived and reveled in,

Clothes for all occasions, a whole vocabulary of clothes, the cuts, the prints, the colors combined in so many different variations, phrasing each a different stance, a way of appearing, a way of being, a place to be,

Or flaunting, flirting with some stance, casual, slack in their acceptance of, or flouting, emphatically slack in their offhand rejection of yet still determined by the same need, the same itch,

Or flaunting, flirting, rejecting as if there were a need, a place, a way,

More slack now than ever, Walker thinks, more offhand, more off, more distant from, thus more desperately casual in the lock it has on them, their claim, the pretense of that which they cannot or will not embrace in the eternal ephemerality of their stance: the assertion of identity apart from yet premised by the argument of a gathering, of an order, of a plan, a plan posited, discounted, and displaced by mannequins who wear the clothes in perfect fits.

Clothes for all occasions in a place where there are no occasions.

Endless babble.

As goes the mall, so go the people. They look excited, scattered, lost. And what looks only crisp in the windows looks shoddy on the people, because they have them on, the shoppers, the clothes with the logos and slogans and designs, and they have washed the newness out of them, and what looks distinctive and almost possible on the mannequins looks cheap and improbable on the people as the clothes yield to the vagaries of the spirit, of the flesh, the bulging, the withering, the varying stages of decline from fitness, from resolve. It is like looking at distorted images in a hall of mirrors at a carnival of bad taste.

Is it the stores that reflect the people’s longing, or the people the stores’? A moot point—the machine is on and running and all there is to do now is wait and see where it will end, the appeal, the looking, the pitch, the buying, the reflection of reflections to exhaustion.

Mirrors upon mirrors.

Do his neighbors no longer shop here, have invasions from tract housing in San Jose come to fill the void? But when the rich dress down and anyone can buy imitations, how can you tell people apart?

Not money, this is not what bothers him. The car, the big house, the lawn he could do without. Not the loss of class lines, because Walker is not a bigot, not a toady for Republican crass. But the lack of some vital distinction.

Not the people, because Walker does not hate people, but there are times when you see too many of them all at once, and there is something about having large numbers together in public places—at a mall—that brings the worst out. You can see it in their faces as they mill through glass and concrete, their expectant but hollow stares, a gaze that touches meanness.

Not a way of being, but a reason for being together. A reason, Walker thinks, and some structure that might contain it.

—Pillar of salt.

Not disappear. In the story he’s trying to recall, someone turns around and someone turns into a pillar of salt. And even though it’s a myth and didn’t happen and couldn’t happen, it doesn’t have to happen to mean something.

—The cities of the plain.

What were their names? But not Greek. It is from the Bible, Genesis if he remembers right, and now he wishes his parents had dragged him to church more often, and that he had paid more attention when they did.

—In the beginning . . .

It’s a story about man’s fall from grace. The cities have gone to pot; the outcry against the sinners is great. God is displeased, so Abraham—

Abraham. Venerable, upright Abraham. This is the one. It is Abraham who turns around, and—

But Walker is not a prude. There is much he can take or leave. Nor does he believe people are wicked. Civilization has progressed beyond such simple views black and white. And we don’t need some transcendental paternal to tell us all how to behave. Still, the world has turned soft and weird, and when we lose our sense of direction, someone pays the price.

Teenagers are the worst.

A group of them have just elbowed their way around him—

Alone, put to task, they are whiny and timid. In a pack, turned loose, they are rude and loud. Before the displays in store windows, however, they are quiet and amazed.

Is that his daughter?

But he only sees their backs as they disappear into the crowd, shouting fuck.

—Sodom and Gomorrah.

So God sends two angels disguised as strangers to take a look around. Then the men of Sodom come and knock, wanting to know the strangers—

Knock on Abraham’s door?

Then what? When does Abraham turn around?

Who turns into a pillar of salt?

Where does Walker fit in?

Has Lisa been known?

Because Walker knows what wanting to know in the Bible means.

And what is Abraham’s wife’s name?

Because Julia is still behind him, thinking god knows what or worse, not thinking, making what comes next more difficult, because now there’s the problem of how to turn around and join her. Should he go back, nonchalant, as if nothing has happened? But something has happened, he has been walking by himself all this time, has already made the turn at the glaring lights of Woolworth’s and is going back the other way. A gap has been created between them that has become too large to dismiss and is growing larger. Has she wandered off into one of the stores without telling him, because she can do that, too, because she likes to shop, leaving it to him to search for her in this junkyard of American life?

Turn around. Go back.

Don’t turn around. Don’t go back.

Keep walking.

Because it has become one of those idle moments when the backwash of your life returns, swirling. You have to find some way to come to an understanding—or pull away before you’re sucked into a vortex of doubt that can stay with you for days.

But how do you assess a marriage, weigh the fights against the closeness, the eventual settling down against the trade-off of affection? Or make sense of the gray periods about which nothing can be said, of those large feelings that have reified into little things lifeless and opaque?

No thought of divorce. The topic has not come up in years. For both their first and only marriage. This has to be worth something. There was a time when he didn’t think they would make it, the charged silences, the dinner arguments that turned into week long battles, the truces broken in bed. But Walker did not enter marriage with illusions.

Yet how do you know when you’re giving in or giving up, compromising or being compromised? How can you even know yourself in marriage? Because it is difficult to see your own heart in the heat of anger, even in the warmth of love. Because the few times he put his foot down, he was brutal, not the Walker he thought he knew—

his father—

Back down, give in, give up—be a modern husband. The issues are never that important.

Turn around. Go back and find her.

Yet her suspicions—

And her criticism—

And her complaints—

But any virtue, on a bad day, can bleed into a vice, and self-assertion turn to self-righteousness. Julia is Julia. He cannot expect her to be someone else. Marriage is learning to live with what first caused you to fall in love—

Up ahead, some commotion, a dozen stores down—

And learning when to put love aside.

Before the fountain, next to deserted I. Magnin’s, a disturbance, and the people spread out like ants in broken ranks—

His love for Julia, who is somewhere behind him, Julia who probably isn’t thinking about anything at all.

It was Silicon Valley, he once thought, the Valley and the pressure of her work. His job is still secure, his company has stayed afloat. But after an initial spurt, her firm, a peripherals start-up, was on the ropes, and her department, PR, was always the first they wanted to sub out. And the high-tech egos, the exaggerated sense of purpose. The artificial sense of time, an urgency measured in microseconds that consumes the daylight hours yet ignores the advance of seasons and years. The euphoria from the feeling of boundless growth that keeps you from seeing how fickle the industry really is.

But now he’s not so sure, because Walker went through the same pressures, yet he learned how to cope. He left hardware design and worked his way into management before the abstract juices ran dry and kids fresh out of school pushed him out. There he learned how to make himself essential without being obtrusive, how to weigh ambition against the risks. When they brought in the fast-food king to run the show, he kept low and weathered the storm.

You need perspective to keep your head in this business, and perspective, he thinks, is what Julia lacks, Julia who is or is not behind him, who has faded from his life—

Someone’s shouting, people have turned to watch—

Lisa was a long, sober debate: their careers, their time, their marriage. When Julia got pregnant—had they really decided?—her stomach seemed to grow not with daughter but their swollen misgivings. A difficult labor, she came weeks late, and then there wasn’t the time or energy to fight. But instantly, magically Julia changed into a mother, a woman he didn’t know was there—

his mother—

Too much a mother. But the bawling baby turned into a sweet kid. And they didn’t argue about how to raise her; on matters of discipline, Julia and he agreed. And when Lisa turned six they both had to join forces against education in California, the crap going on in the schools.

Be a husband, be a father. There are worse things in life to do. Because Walker used to look on those years with fondness—

By the fountain, hands flying, shirts flapping—

Now he wonders why.

It is two boys horsing around—

He wonders why he hasn’t wondered why before.

Damn kids!

Because when it seemed they had most made a life together, even after her company had been saved by merger, Julia said she wasn’t going anywhere in her life. She then enrolled at some school in Palo Alto he had never heard of to get an advanced degree.

Clinical psychology!

Again their marriage was upset—the strain of night classes, the tension of deadlines both from work and school. Her all-nighters, the nights alone, the weekends he had to take Lisa out while Julia pounded away at her papers in manic fits. She made herself crazy studying craziness. It must have been the pressure women had started putting on themselves.

Mumbo jumbo, psychology. DSM-III-R, the manual of insanity at her side, she could only talk about disorders couched in terminology as freakish and fuzzy as the behavior it was supposed to describe. Friends who came to the house sane and healthy transformed, after they left, into figures of limping disease.

What is the point?

She didn’t even tell him when she quit work to go to school full-time. She only said, a week after giving notice, that at the rate she was going, she’d be too old to do anything with her degree if and when she got it. Julia, who is Julia, who had to be Julia, so he helped foot the bill and retrenched, waiting for this phase to pass—

The shouting is louder, a crowd has gathered—

Soft stuff, psychology. Once, for no reason, she hauled him to a marriage counselor, who only bored them both with sappy platitudes. For the experience, she said. A waste, anyway, because they—because Julia decided what they would say before each session.

What is the point?

But a master’s was not enough. She said you had to have a doctorate if you wanted a decent job. So then the dissertation, then the internship, then the boards, more years of this possession—

The crowd has formed a circle, thickening towards the stores. The people are silent, their faces illumined, moved by what they see—

The possession of Julia, with whom he once hiked in the Berkeley Hills, who is somewhere behind him, Julia who is Julia but who is not Julia, who has become someone else, because in his mind he sees her face, feels the blank stare burning through the people between them into the back of his head, Julia who has left it to him to go back and close the gap, has left him with the burden of their marriage, because she must not care, but he does, he cares about her, he cares about their marriage, and there is so much more that he cares about that he will never be able to explain but all he can hear now is the boys’ shouting and it’s getting harder to think—

What is the point?

—The purpose of therapy is know yourself, to uncover the traumas of the past that bind the way you now behave.

She once said.

Why glorify the mess of your childhood, why saddle the present with the past?

—To adapt, to make adjustments.

Adjust to what? Adapt how? Better to blow off steam by slamming the ball around at the courts than worry yourself with old wounds and work yourself up to a froth. What is the point?

—To lead a normal life!

Behind, above the people, water from the fountain shoots up and drops in careless play, looking as if it is falling on their heads. Macy’s mannequins, sheltered, calmly look down on the scene, hands in pockets. On their faces, the contempt that lures. Or laid-back, hands open in half gesture, they look up and beyond the people, blithely amused—

Then the age of analysis. When she found work, she took on a new demeanor, detached, distant, and cool. An intense composure, focused yet evasive: the therapist. Talk at the table got hard, night talk even harder. He was never saying what he thought he was saying, and even the same old marital quarrels somehow got maneuvered around fights into a no man’s land in which there was only the smell of war.

And then they didn’t talk.

Things in the house began to shift and waver with analysis, undergoing a continual transformation back into themselves. The Mission chairs and Navaho rugs and modern art prints turned into Mission chairs and Navaho rugs and modern art prints with new clarity that shed no light.

The crowd shifts, he sees again the hands, the shirts. The boys are not horsing around but fighting—

—Pillar of salt.

And the people keep coming, swarming towards the circle, pressing closer behind him, he is stuck—

—Sodom and Gomorrah.

And they keep flailing away, the kids, in the frenzied, artless combat of adolescents, exposed to each other’s blows without any attempt at defense, a flurry of arms and legs and violent faces, their flapping, floppy oversized plaid shirts—

—The wrath of God.

Not Abraham. Abraham is the one who tries to stay God’s hand, who cuts this deal with Him: if fifty righteous men can be found among the sinners, the cities of the plain will be spared.

Because why should the good be taken with the bad?

Not Abraham but Lot. Lot is who he’s been trying to remember. Abraham cuts the deal, then God sends two Angels disguised as strangers, who find only Lot, modest Lot, who takes them into his home. Then the men of Sodom, young and old, come banging on Lot’s door, wanting to know the strangers. The last straw. It is time to clear the slate. The angels strike the men of Sodom with blindness and tell Lot to take his family and flee, Lot who is not exemplary but merely good. For this he walks alone.

Does Lot’s wife have a name?

Because it is not Lot, but his wife who turns around. All Lot does is stay the course. It is Lot’s wife who has to linger. There is something she has to see. And it is Lot’s wife who turns into—

It’s a myth. More than a story, but less than some miraculous event. It couldn’t happen then and can’t happen now, but it refers to something that could happen and happens all the time. Because myths touch something deep inside all of us that escapes the eyes of shrinks—this is what he learned at school. Myths give shape to inner turmoil, substance to what else might lie beyond. The plot of our lives, the course of the stuff our hearts pump through our heads find connection with a Word:

He is not insensitive.

Or headstrong.

Or blind.

He has nothing to be ashamed of, nothing for which he should be greatly blamed. He has made the best decisions he can, and given the chance, if he had his life to do all over, he would make different, not better choices.

He does not exploit the vanity of people, nor squander his time and money in mindless consumption.

He worked hard to reach his position in the firm but did not break toes along the way. He helps manage the manufacture of computers, which, in the right hands, could do marvelous things.

He has been a dutiful father. His daughter has not dropped out of school, is not pregnant, and does not smoke crack.

He has abided his wife’s whims and moods, has been faithful to her during the times his faith was stretched. At least he has given their marriage a good shot.

And he does not walk too fast. Because when there are no good choices, the best plan is to make a decision and move on, go directly from point A to point B without haste but without hesitation, before the world drags you down into its decay.

But now he can’t see the boys or even the people. There is only a blur of faces, the mass of paunches and elbows and hands against him, the stench of sweat, stale clothes, and cheap perfume, their rank collected breath—

What is he supposed to do now, what does she expect him to do, go back and apologize? Should he slouch back with his tail between his legs, contrite and worried, overcome?

Because she does know what she is doing. A ruse, her weary look. The absent-minded way she lingers behind is a guise, a way of showing his supposed abuses have reached a new level, beyond injury, which now can only be patiently endured—

A strong hand, purple with grotesque tattoo, grabs his arm and pushes him aside—

A bearded lout in a Ferrari T-shirt going for the front row!

Adjust to what? To a society that cannot adjust itself? Adjust to feebs with nothing better to do than watch a couple of brats tear each other apart?

Or should he go back a raving madman?

Because he realizes that this face of worn tolerance is the face of the therapist gone bad, and that the face of the therapist is the same old face he has always known, a platform to stage her old complaints.

Psychology—Psyche. Who is she?

She must be a manipulating woman.

Because what is the motive for studying motives?

Who has to be what for whom?

Why else study psychology but to put him in his place?

And once at breakfast she flatly stated, regarding nothing, merely for his information is how she put it, that he had a passive-aggressive personality.

Water shoots from the fountain, and falls and cracks and spits—

Yet last week, after all the trouble she had gone through, after all the trouble she had caused them at home, after she finally passed the state boards, after she got hired on at the clinic where she did her internship, a solid outfit with a healthy clientele, after only one year of work there, after he had finally resigned himself not to Julia Thompson but Julia Guerrant, Licensed Psychologist, Ph.D.—

Last week she quit again.

Julia the careless, Julia of mincing step. She now talks about going back into PR. The degree in psychology should help, she says.

The floor shakes—

The ceiling falls—

Fire and brimstone rain destruction on the people of the Valley—

—Don’t look back.

Is what the angels say.

Keep walking, Walker thinks. Put these people, this mall, this world behind you. Put her behind you. Not divorce, because that would be avoidance, an indecision, a concession to failure. It has not become necessary yet. But for now, let her be the one who turns and looks, the one who turns into a pillar of salt. Because if she has to look on sick people with her sick, clinical eyes only to decide to pander to their disease, then let her shrivel with her self-absorption and self-indulgence, with her sterile analysis, her bitterness, and her defeat.

Damn borderline bitch!

The image of the body of Walker’s wife starts to dry and harden, to turn into a slender saline post—

And take the goddamn mall with you!

But the shouting stops—

A break in the crowd—

It is not two boys, but a boy and a girl who are fighting, and he sees she is more a woman than a girl because her shirt is ripped open, and they no longer fight because the man who pushed him aside has the boy clenched against his chest.

Walker’s heart bolts, but it only shoots a blank.

Walker, Walker realizes, has made a large mistake.

The girl kneels in the center of the circle with white expression, fending off aid with one hand, gathering her shirt in the other. The boy, his head on the Ferrari emblem, sags in the man’s flexed arms, docile beneath the coils of an immaculately trimmed beard springing from a stern and stoic face.

A trickle of blood leaks from the girl’s ear.

Blood flows freely from the boy’s nose onto a pattern of rippling muscles and sinuous tattoos.

Blood burns in Walker’s head, then drains.

Hitting women is not something men are supposed to do.

And they probably shouldn’t keep on walking while their wives are turning into pillars of salt.

Perhaps, then, this is not the myth that applies to him.

Or perhaps he is not as merely good as he thought.

Or perhaps he does not live in a world of myth. Because no mythic angels have visited Walker. The closest he has come are the Jehovah’s Witness and his son who came to his door one Sunday in stiff white shirts and black ties, who inquired about his faith. Walker, incensed by this invasion, told them solicitors were not allowed.

At any rate, it is mythic God who destroys the cities of the plain. It’s unlikely, however, He would raze a mall for being tacky.

The world is what it is.

But keep walking, Walker, Walker thinks.

Because Walker, not feeling mythic anymore, is too ashamed to turn around.

And point B is no longer in sight.

.

No one looks at him.

Massive columns painted in pastel colors rise from the ashes. Behind, the tempered voices of security guards, a whimper of youth, the sound of gushing water. Here and there, the stillness of indoor trees.

A smoldering conscience—

his—

cools and contracts to form a span of concrete floating on walls of glass.

No one looks at anyone.

But resurrected, they have returned, the dawdlers, the shovers, the mothers with baby carriages, the small children who trip over his feet, and they walk and watch as they walked and watched before, without plan or apparent purpose. They look, if they are looking, with acid eyes at merchandise, which, in the dim ventral cavity of the first floor, glows with unearthly glitter. Or they look at the sharply mannered faces of mannequins loosely grouped in the windows, who, ever blithe, look down, or look away from each other, or look above the heads of the people with casual, crafty disdain, over at mannequins on the other side.

The mannequins on the other side also look down, or away, or up to the second level, where there are more people who look at the stores, if they are looking, at more mannequins who do not look at them but also look off or down or still upward, through the vast open space of the hall, to a latticework of steel girders, to skylights above. Hovering over them all, like unsought grace, a soothing music he can barely hear.

He makes the turn at Sears—

Before he knows it, the bright lights of Woolworth’s—

Now behind him once more, once more the vastness of the mall. Walker looks up again, following the delicate tracery of gazes that do not intersect, up past the cantilevered walkways of the second level, across the space, past steel lace, through glass to a dark sky where fluttering spirits soar to fleeing horizons. Then he looks back down at the faces of the people, and they have changed. Not meanness. This is not what he sees, but wistfulness, inverted. Not guile in the mannequins, but chasteness, disguised and finely tuned. They all have the face of innocence, the people and their sculpted likenesses, of innocence transfigured, which, even turned, is still innocence, in whose wash he is gently absolved.

Then he sees what he has always seen but never noticed before, that not only do most stores sell clothes, but sell clothes for women. So many variations on the theme of women, so many mannequin legs and lips and poses and infinitely subtle curves, so many visions of women, so many ways to wrap and shape the body that eludes the covering—it is where the figure is missed, how well it is missed, that the feminine tenor is revealed. And it is in the bodies of the abstract mannequins—lithe yet featureless plastic hulls, or headless, armless torsos, or just tubing with a cranial circle and a few dorsal bends on which cloth loosely hangs—that the possibilities are most elusive, most alive.

But the real women who model lingerie in the full length, soft color photographs at Victoria’s Secret are subtly pretty, and seriously sensuous—

Then Julia will disappear.

She was dead asleep when he woke this morning, curled and buried in the sheets, and still asleep when he left for work, even though she had an interview with a software firm in San Jose.

—No one’s hiring.

She said at the restaurant.

Another dinner of civil conversation, avoided eyes, a duet of knives and forks. Her guard was up, her face stiff and formal—the professional face—but she looked distracted.

Is she seeing someone else?

Not distracted, but beset, on her face a webbing etched in lines around her eyes, a worrying of the years, a creasing as if from fear.

It is the look that appears in the bathroom mirror at night, when she takes off her face to go to bed.

It was the way Julia the psychologist looked when she got back from the clinic—another day with the beasts of Silicon Valley, obsessives and neurotics and narcissists, their minds fouled by money and chips, who came to her and forced her with their complaints.

—Turn around.

He is supposed to turn around.

—Go back and find her.

He is supposed to go back and find her.

—Take her home.

He is supposed to take her home.

Treeless hills, in summer brown and dry—

And as Walker turns and works his way back through the crowd, composing himself in memory and song, feeling the stir of myth once more, a pillar of salt dissolves and changes to quickness, into a living image of—

Bare hills, back in Berkeley, back in school, now in spring, now fully green, lush from winter rain, the greenness sensual and transcendent, like a woman’s presence, surging yet measured by the soft contours beneath a fluid sky, and he did not mind letting her go ahead when they went hiking, because he would watch her walk in her determined pace, follow the pulse of her calves rise through her thighs to the willful yet cadent bump of the seat of his desire, rise through the slender resolution of a strapless back to impatient shoulders held high, their blades pedaling the rhythm of imagined breasts, and still rise to a head that did not bob yet was fast with the shake of auburn hair, with the breath of her intent, the intent of Julia, emerging yet hidden in the direction of her eyes, he followed the motion of Julia moving through Julia into Julia, a motion separate yet confluent with the motion of the hills, with the motion of his passion for Julia, herself—

And Walker keeps searching among the faces of the people, this memory playing on the strings of his heart, and he hears returned soft music and low voices, a murmur of innocence more melodic, less confused.

Not Lot—

The next day, the apartment on Hillegass, Julia, rising from his bed, moving, yet not moving away from him but with him, before him, before the career that lay ahead of him that held only the logic of tedium and tension, a wasting of his years, Julia rising from his sheets, standing, facing the window, rising in the morning light, as if born there, as if stepping from a shell, but born not virginal but whole, embraced by his old T-shirt, on her luminous and filled, facing him, looking at him, Walker looking back, thinking there is this, if nothing else, but more than anything else there is this, Walker who told himself then what he remembers now, that if he couldn’t be anything in life there will always be—

Not Lot, but Orpheus—

Another myth.

Orpheus the poet, Orpheus the musician, who can charm beasts, stones, and trees. Orpheus the hero and lover, who conquers the world with song. This is the story he’s been trying to remember. It was the pillar of salt that tripped him up. It’s stories like that which screw us all up. Because there’s more to life, Walker thinks, than being good or bad.

Orpheus who turns and finds—

Eurydice—

His wife.

Julia.

But where is she?

Something is not right.

Walker slows yet keeps walking through the crowd, seeing not Julia but glass and concrete, and people and dummies and things. Not people, but a mob, and their faces have changed once more. They turn on him and glare, like the spirits of the damned, brushing, bumping against him, scratching him with their eyes. He no longer hears music but Muzak and the noise of their looks, the sounds of pure boredom, of menace and revenge.

—Don’t look back.

Innocence is the illusion.

—The ascent from hell.

There’s more: Eurydice, after wed to Orpheus, has to flee the lust of another man, and running, steps on a snake and dies. So Orpheus goes down to the underworld and sings to savage Hades, who lets him return her to the living, to his life—on one condition:

Don’t look back until she is in the light of the sun.

So Orpheus leads Eurydice from darkness with the sound of his lyre, but Orpheus turns around a moment too soon. Eurydice, only following him, turns into nothing, and Orpheus must enter the light alone.

But what does Orpheus do wrong?

Is he impatient? Does he love too much?

Or too little?

What has he, Walker, done wrong?

What is the light, and where is it?

How do you know when you’ve seen it?

When are you supposed to turn around in life?

But there she is—

On the escalator, past the fountain, Julia weightlessly descending—

Now at the landing—

And she turns and comes his way, but does not see him—

Go to her.

And Walker picks up his pace.

She is still as ever an attractive woman, who walks with an easy, flat-footed step—

Lisa—

yet walks with strength and poise. With her step, the verdant flow of her dress, a dress of forest green that she wears well, but which he does not recognize even though this evening he watched her put it on. Her face appears and disappears in the crowd, quiet and certain among the moil of stares. And she still hasn’t seen him, and still he goes to her, still not letting her out of his sight, in case she might yet still disappear—

Then Walker stops, not knowing why.

—Myths often run in cycles.

Another voice.

—In a sense they never end. What is solved in one is undone in the next; the cycle begins again.

His humanities instructor, an old, aloof, gray-witted prof, back at Berkeley, back in school.

There is still more, he recalls: After Lot flees Sodom and Gomorrah and is safe in the hills, his daughters get him drunk at night and sleep with him in turn. This way two races of men are born. He heard this not at First Pres in Walnut Creek, but in Western Civ 101.

What is that supposed to mean?

—Some cultures try to separate love from duty, some try to put the two together. Sometimes it’s hard to tell what they are doing. It’s easy to get the two mixed up.

And wifeless, desolate Orpheus is ripped limb from limb by crazed Thracian women, following the word of a jealous, murderous god.

Or that?

—The significance of myths is as much defined by what escapes them as what they manage to contain.

A joker, that prof, an ass—

But Julia still hasn’t seen him.

—We thought we got rid of them, but the desire for myths lives on. What we replaced them with still are myths, but myths turned inside out and displaced.

Yet still she comes, still closer—

Then Macy’s mannequins stare at him, and unseen faces gather and circle around him, closing in. Then he notices the fountain, then looks down. On the dirty white linoleum floor, by his feet, a spot of blood. He realizes where he stands.

But here she is, almost close enough to touch—

And now she sees him—

Her eyes—

Grayish green—

Opened wide—

Rimmed with white—

Not smiling.

Nor in them are Walker’s contained.

Where has she been? What has she been doing? Or thinking about, or of whom? Walker cannot tell. But now he remembers something else she does that happened early in their marriage and still occurs: the only time he ever sees her let her guard down is when he turns a corner at the house and suddenly comes upon her, and she is frankly startled, as if by a stranger.

Her face undergoes vague transformations, a hard beauty turning into harder beauty, without settling on any expression. There is movement in her hair, a writhing, as if from separate, living things.

Snakes, Walker thinks, now feeling a stiffening inside, and fabulous petrifaction.

Yet another myth—

.

.

Willy

.

South/mid 1970s

.

Almost without motion, without expression, Willy sits in the chair beside my desk. Short, thin, yet tough; white, but dark, reddened with age, maybe with dirt; his long face vacant, yet grave, yet durable, yet distinct with deeply cut features, yet pensive in the branching, in the involution of its complex lines—he seems large, and older than he probably is.

He leans forward and stares in my direction, but does not see my eyes or speak. His eyes, yellow, hard, and dull, glisten like glazed pots. And looking at him, at his empty gaze, at his taut jaw, at his thin lips split and dried shut, you would think that he has never spoken before in his life, or if he has, will not speak again. Only his hands move, above his lap, as if he is trying to join them but misses. I can’t remember if I said anything when he came in or if he replied, even though he just got here. A presence like his is disconcerting.

I sit back in my chair, trying to decide what I am supposed to do. I’m in a lousy mood and can’t shake it. Seeing Willy has sent it somewhere else, but nowhere higher. It is cold and gray out, but hot inside the building. Willy hasn’t taken off his coat, though, a denim jacket whose blue has faded. He also has on ribless corduroys and a pair of cowboy boots whose baroque tooled pattern has become obscured by the white cracks of wear. Nor has he taken off his hat—

That hat—

It’s one of those fleece lined leather caps with a visor, turned up, ear flaps, down, and a strap that dangles by his chin. On anyone else the hat would look moronic. On him, I don’t know what to think. Then again, when you’re down, simple things make little sense.

There is, of course, something about him, but in this job we see all kinds and learn not to take notice. Better to be patient until he says what he wants. His is a silence I am reluctant to disturb.

No smell of booze, however.

When the receptionist said there was a Willy Newhouse in the waiting room, the name didn’t ring any bells. It is easy to forget names and faces here—I have a caseload of over two hundred—but I don’t see many men. AFDC—welfare—is for kids and their mothers. Last week the only guy I saw was Freddy Angel, who was working an angle to claim his ex-wife’s check. Not so fast, Freddy. The few men I do see usually come in to try to get IV-D off their backs. IV-D: the agency that tracks down absent fathers to collect support.

Or the name Willy, a throwback to our days of Uncle Willys, made me think he might be a black grandfather whose daughter had run out, who had taken custody of the kids and come to continue their aid. I don’t see many white grandfathers, but it is not because their daughters are good mothers.

Yet this Willy is white, and there isn’t anything about him that tells me he is trying to get out of something or take charge of anything else. There is nothing about him that tells me anything at all. I have no idea who he is or why he is here.

That hat—

Reception has made a mistake.

“Letty.”

Did he say that? I look at him. His lips are welded, his eyes are fixed somewhere on my chest. But Letty does ring a bell. Letty Newhouse was once in my caseload; Willy must be her husband. And since the case was in her name, since only Letty came for the reviews, I have never seen him before.

Then I remember: this is the man I tried but couldn’t reach all summer a few summers ago. I needed to talk to him, not Letty, to make some adjustment, the nature of which now escapes me. I assume that is why he is here, and I tell him this, though I don’t think he has followed. He does, however, watch me when I leave the room to get the file.

That hat—

Another bell—

I feel I have seen him before—

But bells ring all the time here, and when they do they lack resonance. The things that come together seldom add up to very much.

Then in the hall it occurs to me: I’m the one who got this started, and he hasn’t spoken because he’s waiting for me to say what I want. Yet I don’t know why he hasn’t brought Letty or why he’s taken so long to come. I remember now I gave up on the case.

But Social Services is also a place where it’s easy to forget what you have done.

.

There’s a mob at the counter—Reception keeps the records. I weave my way up to the front and still have to shout the number of Willy’s file. Behind me, the push of clients. Hands, faces, the padding of winter coats; the smell of stale wool and sweat. Anxious voices, angry voices, the struggle to make oneself heard. You get used to it. I stay and stand my ground because I want to get back to the office. I don’t feel right leaving Willy there by himself.

But Judy brings the wrong folder. She glares at me, as if I have made the mistake, then goes back into the file room. After a few minutes, she still hasn’t returned, so I retreat and lean against the back wall, settling down. Letty’s file has probably been misplaced. You get used to this, too.

I was in good spirits this morning, almost elated, really for no reason. Moods come and go around here. You learn not to trust them. Also, you have to be careful: let yourself get too high and you only see how far you have to fall, and this is what happened, I was working on a good depression when Willy came.

Better to keep to yourself, because what I feel is not important compared to what my clients go through. Better, too, to be guarded, because they can turn on you for what has brought them here.

Next to me, the waiting room, also packed. Clients who have made it past reception. They look tired and worried—and are tired and worried—but loud voices have subsided to the low moan of boredom. Cold weather is now the problem, as winter is an expensive season. Bills pile up, they run out of money. Oil tanks empty in the middle of the month. So they come in to get a supplement to their check. Reception sends them to the department that handles emergencies, who sometimes send them to us, Eligibility, but we send them back to Emergency Services because this is not our job, and for each contact they have to go through Reception again and return to the waiting room until they lose heart and leave, or find someone who gives in and can get his supervisor to authorize a check. This is not a procedure. It just works out that way. Supplements are discouraged—bad form—but we also don’t have enough money to cover very many.

Some clients, when they run out of oil, try heating the house with their kitchen stoves, and then get stuck when the electric bill comes due. We’ve also run into a few fires.

Some come in not knowing what they want. Maybe this is somewhere to go on a winter day.

Some clients, however, know the system better than we do. Perhaps they even know us better than we know ourselves, because they know if they persist we usually do give in. They have a role to play, we have a role to play; the system keeps the game going.

Social Services is not a depressing place, though, only dismal. But here is an accomplishment, that we are able to subdue misery to the gray mood of a waiting room. The state keeps their checks at a precise amount just below what they need so that they scrape by without feeling too comfortable in the bosom of the state’s good grace. Because the state has more than the feelings of clients to weigh. Mood management, after all, is what we really do. A balance has to be struck between the guilt of those who see the poor as the saintly oppressed and the outrage of others who see demons on our backs. And because Raleigh answers to Washington, we have to consider the mood of the nation as well. Race, whatever is left of our old Southern business, complicates the equation one factor more. Like fashions our regulations change by slight degrees to reflect the shifts in mood. But it’s not easy telling devils from angels, someone’s benevolence from another’s malice. Everyone feels queasy about welfare, so it has to be kept out of the way, in its place. No one can stomach his ideals very long. If I side with my clients, it’s because the other players are harder to take.

It’s a difficult job, modulating the conscience of the world. And it’s a hard world, but it’s delicately constructed.

I’m on my fifth—sixth?—year here, still holding. Eligibility is largely clerical work: we fill out forms and add up numbers. There are other jobs at Social Services where I could make better use of my skills, other agencies where I could apply—and I have looked into these and I am going to school nights to get a MSW—but I feel I should stay put, because it is here, in Eligibility, that I probably do the most good. At least I get something tangible—money—into my clients’ hands.

Besides, after the last round of cuts, hiring is off everywhere.

Judy brings the right folder this time. Holding it, gauging its thickness, touching the softness years have worn into once stiff cardboard covers, seeing the fleshy beige color, I remember two things: Letty is still in my caseload, but also Letty is dead.

Willy, wifeless, sits in the chair beside my desk.

I carry the folder back through the institutional silence of our halls. Over an inch of forms—it is heavy, and feels heavier with what it no longer contains. I try to shape the appropriate emotion, but it is not sadness I can create. The best way to show compassion is not to give it. Clients neither want nor need nor believe our hearts. And my feelings won’t bring Letty back, or make his life or my work any lighter. There is no reason to add the weight of my sorrow to the burden he must presently bear.

Better, sometimes, to go under. It doesn’t matter what I feel. Still, I have discovered this much, the virtue of distance.

.

He is staring out the window when I return and doesn’t look at me when I sit down or at the file I rest between us on the desk. The coat lies in a heap beside his chair; the hat has been strapped tight around his jaw.

I apologize for the delay. Willy doesn’t move, doesn’t speak. I ask him if he is comfortable. He looks at his hands; his fingertips touch. His expression has not changed, or rather he has not found one.

I’m down. Willy is wherever Willy is. I won’t be able to bridge the space between us. I start to mention Letty, but what can I say? What is there to say? What else is there to do, what else can I do but get on with it?

I flip through the file, trying to figure out what needs to be done. After a few months here, names and numbers bleed together, and only through our forms can we find the order our grace has given. On the right side of the folder, Food Stamp forms. Below Food Stamps, agency memos, my notes, and other stuff we don’t know where else to put. On the left, AFDC review forms, the latest, mine, on top. Beneath mine, other reviews in other hands, gradually, increasingly yellow, filled out by the caseworkers before me, none of which I’ve had time to read.

Starting at the bottom, with the original application, I work my way up through the reviews that follow. It begins to fall into place. The check—about $200—was set up seven years ago for Letty’s two daughters from a previous marriage, Sarah and June, not long after she married Willy. The girls’ father had taken off or died—I can’t find which. Soon, a son with Willy, Sears, who was not added to the check. Sears was not eligible for AFDC because both parents were in the home. Letty was not eligible because she had Willy. Willy was not eligible because he was able to work—and did have a job. Only the daughters were eligible. The whole family, however, because of their income, could buy Food Stamps. My job depends upon understanding such subtleties.

The other reviews, a quick series in different hands, don’t tell me much, except that the family got shuffled around the department. Then I reach my handwriting, which tells me less. I return to the bottom. On the back of the application, crammed in unlined space, a long narrative from Letty’s first caseworker. He says that Willy is profoundly retarded, and in so many details of income and capability, outlines the situation of a man for whom he sees no hope. Willy must have come in with Letty for the initial interview. This caseworker also has his doubts about Letty and doesn’t think the family will hold together long.

Such analysis is not part of our job, however, nor does it serve any purpose. We’re not here to assess our clients’ character, their abilities, or their fate. And our work can distort vision; more often than not, our judgment is wrong. I remember the guy. He seemed serious and intense, but he burned out after a few years, quitting about the time I started. Letty lasted much longer at what she did than he.

Also, he was confused. Someone who is profoundly retarded would have trouble just tying his shoes. Profoundly retarded—I am struck by the term though, and find it somehow apt. There is something here, which might explain Willy’s silence.

I look at Willy. His eyes are still on his hands, restless before him. He begins working them together, fumbling, forcing his fingers in air, as if in something stiff.

He still has not looked at me.

I search for his age—57: another eight years before he can collect Social Security. On the other side of the folder there is a memo from Family Services, undated—something about child abuse. I don’t remember what this was about, but there must not have been anything to it. All kinds of things creep into our files. The memo, unfathomable in our cryptic jargon, tells me nothing. Also a memo from the fraud unit, warning me about my delay. I look back at my last review and wince. It is dated over two years ago. The law says we have to check up on our clients every six months. I’m not a stickler for rules, but I’m not careless, and the best way to keep from getting mired in regulations is to follow them.

What has happened? I go over my notes. The last time Letty was in my office, she said Willy’s back had given out, that he had to quit work. I told her he should look into Disability, though apparently nothing came of it. Going back through the Food Stamp forms, I see that I did reduce the amount they had to pay since their income went down when he lost his wages.

Letty. For a brief moment she comes alive. Also white, but also with a reddish complexion, Letty was a squat, confused, yet good-natured woman who always managed a smile, though it seemed to hurt. Now she is gone, I can only hope, to a place where her spirit brings less pain and more coherence. I only saw her two or three times. I found out she had died when I called one summer after she missed an appointment for her review, and one of the girls answered. Sandwiched between my notes, a clipping from the obits. We have to verify everything.

The next time I called, the phone was disconnected. Then I sent out four or five appointment letters that got no reply but were not returned by the post office. Later that summer, I went by the house. My notes stop there, and I can’t find anything else to account for the time since. I remember, however, why I put the case aside. I wanted to leave it alone to give the family time for their grief. I probably also knew it would be a hassle. Still, the delay—I should have eventually done something.

I remember my supervisor now, too—her memos I did not file. She told me to take care of Letty immediately and hounded me about her for weeks. The agency was getting bad press, and dead people receiving welfare was not a story we could afford, no matter what the circumstances. Besides, she said, you never know about some people.

What else is there to know?

She hasn’t mentioned the case since, however. No follow-up from Fraud—or Family Services, whatever their concern was. The last recession must have knocked us all for a loop.

But there is really only a slight technicality involved. The family is still receiving Letty’s share of the Food Stamps, yet only about twenty bucks. The check is still going out in her name, but Willy, as stepfather, is not legally responsible for the girls’ support, and they have not yet turned eighteen, so they can continue receiving the check in his name. Everyone can keep the Food Stamps—though I will have to subtract Letty’s portion—but I first have to terminate Letty’s case and have Willy fill out a new application. This is why I needed to have him come in.

I explain this to Willy and he nods without looking up. I don’t think he has followed, however, or knows what I am doing. His eyes, still on his hands, still fumbling, show not concentration but whatever its opposite is, yet an opposite equally intense.

Profoundly retarded—

Keep going. I pull out a fresh form and start the eligibility routine. I inform him that he is entitled to receive assistance from the state regardless of his race or creed.

No response.

I ask for the names of two people who are not relatives, who can testify to the information he gives.

No response, but his fingers straighten and spread out wide.

I look at the names on the last review.

Can I use Mrs. Wilson Porter, Mr. Justin Clyde?

He closes his hands. I decide this means I can.

Do they still live at the same address?

He squeezes his hands into fists.

I copy their addresses down.

Does he still live at the same address?

He puts one fist above the other.

But if he weren’t, he wouldn’t be getting the checks. The post office won’t forward them. The last review says he lives in a trailer park off I-85, at the edge of town. I copy this address, too.

Is anyone else living in the home, other than his two daughters, his son, and him?

His fingers fan out again.

What does that mean? Yet we’ve got a dialogue going, we’re making progress, and I continue down the page in this fashion, asking questions, looking at his hands and at the information on the last review, making my best guess. Letty’s interviews, I recall, went about the same way. The closer I get to the end of the form, however, the more I doubt what I have done.

Race?—but this is a sensitive question that we usually answer ourselves. I start to put white, then check the other reviews to make sure. The caseworker before me thinks Willy and Letty are half Lumbee. Perhaps I am wrong—his skin color suggests several shades. Newhouse, Lumbee. The name could be some kind of translation, but then again, it could be anything. Other than the cowboy boots, there is little to place him.

I turn back another year, to the worker before him, and she lists Letty as white and Willy as black. The caseworker before her says they are both black. The next checked Other for both, and the guy who took the application left the ethnic boxes blank. I can’t find anyone who agrees with me that Willy is white. Race, of course, does not matter here—though I wonder about some of us—but how can something that doesn’t matter yet has mattered so much so long be so uncertain?

I return to my notes. I did try to call the references after Letty died. The man who answered Mrs. Wilson Porter’s number did not know any Newhouses or Porters. Mr. Justin Clyde’s cousin, Mattie Hayes, answered his number and said he had moved out of state. She didn’t know any Newhouses, either. Then I went out to the trailer park—

Not a trailer park, more a scattering of mobile homes, wrecked cars, and mud among a clearing in the pines. I went out four times that summer. His trailer—a two-tone, off-white and a scabrous pastel—seemed bent, and listed on cinder blocks. No one answered when I knocked and the mailbox was empty. I didn’t see anyone inside when I stepped up to the small window on the door. Dust covered the kitchen countertops. Dry dishes were piled in the sink. What little furniture there was in the main room had no obvious arrangement, as if it had been left behind. Each time I went back, everything looked the same—

You never know about some people—

He still hasn’t looked at me—

Blood rushes to my head; his darkens with suspicion. Of all the things I should be used to here, this is the one that always catches me unprepared. It never happens the way you expect, but then that’s the way it always happens, and if there is anything familiar about Willy, this is what it is. His hands grope through air again, now in an awkward gesture of guilt. The image I had when he first came in undergoes vague racial transformations, then disappears, leaving in its wake the ghost of a fraud.

If I didn’t think of fraud that summer, it’s probably because it was too obvious, too simple, too sloppy. But he could have packed the kids off to a relative, and now live somewhere else, in another county for all I know, stopping by the trailer once a month for the check, which doesn’t make much sense, but it doesn’t have to. He probably couldn’t unload the thing anyway, which might be what got him started. And he may yet be in the trailer, because what I saw is how he lives, who he is, what I see before me. If he has come in today, it could be to find what else he can get from us, which doesn’t make sense either, but it’s how he would do this, too. There are other possibilities I can build, none of them neat, but they all come to the same conclusion.

I think of the questions I now have to ask, realize the futility, then consider calling Fraud. I look out the window, feeling angry and sick. I may have felt this way before.

The investigation would be a mess. It wouldn’t be my mess, but still it would be something I passed off, and too much gets passed off here as it is. Yet what would happen? We’d have to track down the kids, but then return them to Willy because while he’s not legally responsible for their support,  he is still their legal guardian. Maybe we’d try to take them away because he’s not a suitable parent. But we couldn’t do that without a court hearing to find him incompetent, which is unlikely. And even if he’s declared incompetent, then what? They go back to where he sent them? Not without another hearing. Get placed in foster care? If anyone would take them. Odds are, whatever we do, they’d still get stuck with Willy.

I don’t know what to do.

I have to do something.

I look at him, he looks at his hands. They still work their awkward massage of the space between them, define and knead it, then, collapsing together, destroy it—but they take my anger with their embrace.

What is at stake here? Who would gain what? What is right for whom? If we pursue this, he won’t get thrown in jail, which shouldn’t satisfy anyone anyway because it would cost the state a ton. And we’ll never see the money. When we return the kids, he gets to keep AFDC, but we still have to nail him for fraud, which, though it’s not that much a month, over years runs into thousands, which he won’t have, so we’ll take a small percentage from the check, token installments for the integrity of our system. Whatever life the kids had with Willy before he sent them away will at best get slightly worse. The kids are probably OK where they are, certainly better off than with Willy. And what about Willy himself? His crime is not heinous and he still deserves some kind of life. Two hundred bucks a month is hardly plush, even if I leave things alone and he keeps it all to himself. And if we do pursue and do manage to place the kids, he’ll lose the check yet still have to pay, but then he will have nothing—

Unless he has gone back to his old job, or found another.

His hands are now apart, his curled fingers upturned, searching for what they just lost.

Not likely. But I look at my notes to see where he last worked: Triad Brick.

Another bell—

Memories of heat and darkness, the hellish world of a kiln—

I worked there.

I don’t know why this didn’t strike me when Letty last came in, because I had to call the place to verify he had quit. Perhaps it did. Perhaps I even mentioned it to Letty, but I can imagine how far that went.

When I finished school, I took junk jobs while I looked for real work. In one I was a brick palletizer at Triad, a complicated title for a simple task. At the beginning of each day four of us, two to a team, would enter one of a dozen large dome kilns by a small opening, climb the pile, and lift, lower, and stack bricks on wood pallets so a forklift could come and take them someplace else.

We may have worked there at the same time—

But that year is a fog. I signed up at a temp agency and was sent from job to job. Some lasted only a few weeks; others I’d quit because I got fed up with the work, the pay, only to move on to another, just as bad. Between jobs, the interviews that didn’t pan out.

We had to have worked at the same time—

But there is little worth remembering from that time, because it was a time when I was young and stupid, easily impressed, and just as easily overwhelmed.

Time at the kiln was measured in bricks: twenty to fifty bricks a pallet, depending on their size, two or three pallets an hour, sixteen to twenty-four pallets a day. Cramped between a mound of bricks and the curved wall of a kiln, we moved time, lifting, lowering, stacking, and thus diminishing it, only to return to a kiln full of bricks the next day. It was a time of endless subtraction.

Yet the fog lifts, the last seven years vanish, as if to reveal a landscape, a pattern, a world—

We may have worked there together—

But once inside the kiln, you couldn’t see who you worked with, and after a while didn’t care. All I can remember from Triad is bricks. They were sharp edged, heavy, and rough; we had to use thick rubber gloves to hold them that we’d wear out in a week. Stacked close to the ceiling, smallest on top, largest at the bottom, bricks blocked out, seemed to absorb what little light came in. You couldn’t even hear yourself think or cuss, because outside the opening fans the size of airplane propellers roared to cool us, the bricks off. As we worked, we bumped, dragged, and scraped the bricks against each other and ourselves, raising a dust the fans returned that burned our eyes and, mixed with our sweat, seeped into cuts and scratches. Our hands cramped, sometimes locked. The bricks, still warm from the firing, got hotter the closer we worked to the center of the pile, as if in some inferno. Even on the cold mornings—it was winter—we stripped to our waists ten or fifteen minutes into the day—

Except for the old man—

Who never took off his jacket—

Or that hat—

Willy.

Now I see him in a kiln, crawling crablike over a pallet of bricks, his face covered with soupy, reddish paste, as if he secreted it, as if he were made of it, not flesh. Now I look at him on the chair beside my desk and see the same dark color, the same man—

I start to tell him—

But he still hasn’t looked at me.

Tell him what? He wouldn’t recognize me. And what could I mean to him if he did? I was just one of many others, and we couldn’t have worked together long. Teams changed, we came and went, mostly part-timers like me on the part-time circuit.

One day, we were together only one day—yet I know it was Willy who I worked with seven years ago. He moved slowly and deliberately, but with economy of effort, and I had trouble keeping up. I had the position on top, Willy, below. I was always stopping to straighten my back and catch my breath, and my halting labor broke the cadence of his. This irritated him, I could tell, but he never said anything about it. He never spoke about anything, or swore, or shrank, or groaned. The only interchange we had was the passing of hot, heavy bricks. Nor did he look up; he saw no further than arm’s length, than the bricks that came down in irregular rhythm—

Just as he now stares no farther than the form on my desk. His eyes, not focused, streaked with brown veins, moist but lifeless—do not show the light needed for recognition.

His hands, their quivering tendons, the large, knotted knuckles, his long, bent fingers, sinewy and scarred—clutch at something he cannot grasp.

Not a fraud—

But here he is, the man I spent a summer trying to track down, the man I once worked with one day seven winters ago, perhaps even the same day as today—it may not mean anything to him, but it must mean something. And though it may only be a coincidence, it is a large one, and like the blow that brings revelation, it strikes me with near celestial ring.

It was about the time he got married.

It was about the time Letty first came to Social Services.

It wasn’t long before the time I took this job.

And it was a time when I was young and stupid, but it was a time when I saw things precise and clear. While my body got stiff from the bending, the lifting, the lowering, my head grew sharp. Holding the bricks, I felt the weight of ideas, in the repetition of the labor, sensed an outline of new order. From the fatigue, the burning, the ill use of our bodies, I extrapolated the possibilities of meanings. And in the darkness of a kiln, I could see the afterimage of invisible cities, radiant, harmonious, and light—

The old man, one of the guys told me during a break, had been there twenty years. I only lasted a few weeks. Profoundly retarded—what could twenty years at Triad do to someone’s mind?

Not a fraud. It is no more likely he has cheated the state than it is he would realize that his wife’s death meant he’d have to come in so a name could be changed on a check. And it’s even more unlikely he has sent the kids packing. Willy is what he is, what I should have seen when he first came in, what I should have seen all along. He is a small man who has kept his family, his life together as well as he can, as well as can be expected—how much worse than any of us?—a man colored but not yet broken by the machinery of a huge and senseless plan—

But all I can do for him is finish the application so he’ll be square with the state, yet at least I have this to do. There are only a few lines left.

“Willy,” he says. “Name’s Willy Newhouse, not Will’m.”

He points to where I have written his name on the form.

And he looks at me, and his eyes flash.

And I tell him what I told his wife, that he might be eligible for Disability.

And he seems surprised, as if this is the first time he has heard about it. I tell him that if they do find him sufficiently disabled, he will recieve a check from Social Security, I will add him and his son to our check, and he’ll also get Medicare so someone can look at his back. Willy nods with me as I explain the procedure.

And there is so much more to be said, so much more I want to tell him, but I don’t know what or how—

I rise from my desk and go to the window, pointing out the Social Security building. He comes and, back bent, looks out.

But I still don’t think he has followed.

On one side of Social Security, the bus station; on the other a liquor store where a few drunks are standing. Beyond Social Security, beneath gray skies, a visible city: our city: a gray city, with buildings made of glass and steel and bricks.

The coincidence doesn’t mean anything. We did shit work together for a day. I moved on to Social Services. He stayed at Triad until his back gave out.

But his face, no longer vacant, is now eager, and as we return to our seats, his eyes, now alive, still look at mine. He’s waiting for me to say something else, but I don’t want to tell him what I haven’t yet told him that I know I won’t be able to explain. If he does receive Disability, we will have to count the extra income against his Food Stamps and it will also have to be considered for his son’s support, so the check from us I’m contemplating will need to be adjusted. My head races with the numbers, but I can’t figure it out. He should come out ahead, but not by much. I’ll have to wait several months for a notice from Social Security and then make the revision, which I will also have to explain—

If I can get him back in.

I doubt he’s thinking about a check from Social Security, however. I am afraid that, from all the letters I sent him, from my visits to the trailer that his neighbors must have told him about, from the widely spaced block letters of the words Social Services on the sign outside our building, from the hours he has just spent in my office—from all this, he might feel more is involved than my turning his wife’s check over to him or recommending other types of aid. I’m afraid he’s waiting for me to tell him something else, something he has been waiting to hear all his life.

He keeps looking at me, making me look down. When I raise my eyes, his fall, and though still glazed, once again look dull and dead. Then he looks at his hands, then begins to ply some new stuff he has found. This stuff is larger and stiffer.

I stare at the file, wondering how he and the kids have gotten by since he left his job. Their only income has to be Letty’s check.

A sweet guy, a nice man. Also a good worker. I remember this now—it’s what the secretary at Triad said when I called after I last saw Letty to verify he had quit. I asked if Willy had insurance or a pension. She said she thought we handled those things.

A pervert. Now I remember this, too. A woman phoned the agency, who referred her to Family Services, who sent me the memo in the file. And here they are, buried in the right side of the folder—my notes on the memo, dated that summer. The woman said he had an eye on one of the daughters, that we had to get that man out of the trailer, that Willy was dangerous. Family Services asked her how she knew this, and she said she knew what she knew. They doubted, however, there was anything to it. They got calls like that all the time. Also the informer was on our roll, and clients often strike at each other. Still, they staked out the trailer for several nights, as is their procedure, and didn’t see anything definite. A tossup, maybe, they said. At any rate, they needed hard proof before they could act, and let the case go. In my notes, the informer’s name: Mattie Hayes. The cousin of Willy’s reference, whom I called that summer, who said she didn’t know him. Did I make any connection then? What connection is there to be made?

A sweet guy, a good worker, a pervert—but what does anyone know about this man? What can any of us know about another?

Profoundly retarded—but how can we measure a man? How can we compare what he is with what he might have become, had his life been different, or gauge what he is or was or might have been against the endless workings of a world where things don’t work out?

Still, that hat—

But we protect ourselves as best we can.

Not a fraud—

Not a pervert—

I have to believe in something.

Profoundly retarded—I feel there is depth to what he cannot say. His silence is not the vacuum of empty mind, but has presence and weight, like the stuff his hands now try to mold. And there is something large in his perseverance, something lasting, something permanent in what must be his resolve, something monumental purely in the fact that he is here today before me. This is what I realize, the only significance my few hours with Willy might contain, that when you only have yourself to count on, you’d better learn how to count. I want to ask him how he has done it, where he has found the strength—

What I ask him is what I read from the last page of the form: Has he given his answers to the best of his abilities, does he understand that any deliberate misinformation constitutes fraud? Does he know the penalties for such behavior, a fine, imprisonment, or both?

He does not look up from his hands, still laboring with that stuff. The stuff has gotten larger.

I only need his signature to complete the application. I tell him to make an X, show him one, and rise to get a witness, but he leans over my desk, takes the pen from my hand, and pushes it against the form with his fist. He writes in large wavy letters:

N–E–W

—the letters falling away from the line.

He stops, ponders, then continues:

H–U–E–O–S

—down to the bottom edge of the page.

Twenty to fifty bricks a pallet times two or three pallets an hour times eight hours a day times two hundred and fifty days a year times over twenty years would make how many buildings, how many hueoses?

How small, how insignificant my life, I think.

He returns my pen and sits back.

There is nothing else I can do for him. I look towards the door. He looks at his hands, and goes back to working that stuff. Whatever he holds now is unmanageable and threatening, and he works it harder and struggles, and panic strikes his eyes—

It is a large coincidence that has brought us together again, but it occurs to me that our situation is really the same, that there is little difference between what I did seven years ago in a kiln and what I am doing now.

I am late for my eleven o’clock appointment.

There are others in the waiting room, waiting for me.

I fear he will sit there forever, and try to think of a way to get him to leave.

That hat—

I had one when I was a kid and hated it.

What I think next is that it is time to quit this job and move on if I’m ever going to get anything out of life.

“Mr. Newhouse, I was sorry to hear about Letty.”

But it’s too much. The old fool starts to cry.

.

The Adventures of Little Willy

.

Winter 2008

.

The man standing beside them in produce, squat, bald, and muscular, casually thoughtful and apparently self-assured, picks up a cantaloupe and holds it before him, examining the network of its veins. He raises and lowers it a few times, testing its weight, which makes his arm muscles flex. He is wearing a sleeveless T-shirt. On his upper arm, a tattoo of a well-known planet, circled twice by barbed wire. As his muscles expand, the planet pumps against the wire.

Then he lifts the melon to his nose and smells the crater left where it was pulled from the vine.

Then he looks at the price and winces.

“No way, Jose!” he says.

“No way Jose!” Willy, behind him, repeats joyously.

“What’s that?” William asks.

“No way Jose!” he says again, giving the carrier, a kind of backpack, a shake.

“Settle down back there, William.”

“Willy!” he shouts.

William was against Willy having his name, but at least he isn’t a junior, as he took his middle name from his wife’s father, about whom William has mixed opinion. He was especially opposed to Willy, but somehow it happened and stuck. And every now then Miriam and even he let Little Willy slip, which doesn’t upset Willy at all but rather transports him into a smile.

“Right. We’re going to hear that the next few days, aren’t we, Willy?”

“No way Jose!”

“That’s what I thought.”

At tomatoes William picks one up and studies it, realizing he doesn’t know what to look for.

He believes he should help out with all the tasks at home, in part from principle, in part because it is expected, though Miriam usually takes over shopping and cooking, and he has almost no experience in either. Before Willy came, they usually went out, and if he works late now, which is often, he eats at the office, the food provided all hours by a fine catering service, one of the perks at the firm.

The tomato doesn’t smell like anything and feels as hard as a baseball. He holds it like one, clutched between thumb and two fingers, and reaches back so Willy can see.

“What do you think?”

“No way Jose!”

Then he looks at the price.

“Jesus,” he says.

“Ease-us!” Willy says.

“I didn’t mean that. Don’t say that, Willy. Don’t let your mother hear you say that. Not that Mom’s religious. Not that she isn’t religious. I don’t know what your mother is. Say ‘No way, Jose.’”

“No way Jose!”

“There you go. I hope the farm workers are getting their share.”

“No way Jose!”

“You’re probably right.”

Because William does have principles and believes that fairness should be a universal given, the starting point for all discussions. At Stanford he majored in history, years spent unveiling the masks of power to show the abuses of class and race, the underside of economics. If he doesn’t yet have a clear picture of the way the world should be, he can project the lines of possibilities where it ought to go. And at first he saw his work as a way to realize these possibilities—they all did there—or at least it had this potential in a world that was transforming itself into something else. There was so much in the air, not that long ago.

He tries several more tomatoes, and they all look, feel, and smell the same. He wonders how long it will take them to ripen and develop taste, if they ever will. He read somewhere tomatoes were being genetically engineered to be hard for shipping and wonders if this is the case here, and if so, why a sign does not tell him so, and if they are and he hasn’t been told, whether or not there might be some kind of problem down the road.

He wants to ask the bald man for his advice, but the man has disappeared, so he selects four at random,

“No way Jose!”

“We need tomatoes, Willy.”

He estimates the total price, feeling inside somewhere a sideways lurch.

Economy, not being extravagant or wasteful, is also a matter in which he believes, at least in principle. But when he started work no one thought much about the actual facts of money or the basis of its existence. Their pay was good and had every chance of going higher. But not the money—that was never the goal—yet it just happened to be there, and elsewhere in the world there seemed to be plenty to go around and more was being created every day. They were the ones, after all, who helped retool the machinery that passed it around. More than their technology, and perhaps because of it, it seemed the exigencies of money itself had been transcended, part of world’s transformation. He has begun to consider, however, the necessity of putting economy into practice. The payments on their townhouse in Sunnyvale are, in fact, quite steep.

He works his way down Miriam’s list and through produce, negotiating the narrow aisles among the others—it is Saturday and the store is crowded—who, like him, sort and pick and squeeze and stare at prices. Nothing looks right to him, everything seems off in some way. But he cannot tell what is pliant because it has been squeezed several times before, nor knows what size is right or what might be abnormally small and scraggly or overly large and tumescent. He does not know what to make of smells that are faintly suggestive or too much so, nor how to read the bright colors that have been painted on skins, enticing and unconvincing. He has no idea what the skins have been treated with to fend off whatever there is that attacks them. He has no idea what relationship anything he sees bears to the natural world, about which he wishes he knew more. He is beginning to feel a little lost.

And he thinks he heard on the news the other day that some produce item was linked to an outbreak of E. coli.

What was it?

Also a little sick.

“Onward!” he says.

“On-word!” Willy replies.

“Vision!”

“Vizzen!”

“There isn’t anything that can’t be solved with spirit and a little imagination.”

It’s the way they talk at the firm.

But at lettuce a burst of thunder gives both of them a start—a recorded sound from small speakers announcing a misting spray to keep the leaves fresh, which soon follows.

He took the job in the years that followed the dot-com bust, but after the clearing out and consolidating and restructuring, the enthusiasm of before returned and the picture started to look bright again, especially for those who laid low and waited to go public. He works for AskUS, an internet search site, who revamped their pages and launched a publicity campaign, hoping to displace the other whose homepage sported only one word.

His degree from Stanford got him an interview. His major in history, however, was good only for a job in sales, though they don’t call it that. Everything at AskUS is called something else, this renaming stemming from the desire that what they do not rest grounded in the mundane. When he makes his pitch to prospective clients, he ascends into an abstruse world of technical details about the special algorithm of their search engine and the powers of their banks of servers, then moves up into an abstract realm of strategies and initiatives and global action, his talk sprinkled with sentimental buzzwords—synergism and creativity and proactive solutions—that do get a rise from his clients, and sometimes from him as well, sometimes so much so that there are times he forgets what it is he actually does.

But it is one thing to be sentimental, yet entirely another to aspire, and the place the words posit seems moved by the desire they all share that they look beyond themselves to create a better world. The firm has genuine commitment to common causes. Nor does he have to hide his views but can speak openly there. He wouldn’t have enjoyed such freedom on a corporate ladder, or maybe even in academia, where he gave some casual thought.

What he does is sell sponsored links advertising related products that appear on the page when a user makes a search, for which clients pay pennies a click, AskUS’s bread and butter. Still, there is nothing base in making and selling products, or telling people about them. And earning profits from the process is the way the whole world has gone. Any drive needs sustenance; profits will feed the future of the country, as well as theirs. The Web, all the information out there, all the hands in the U.S., in the world, that might provide it and into which it might be put—there has to potential, and possibilities that can’t even be imagined until they start to unfold. His hope is to move into product development, where he does have some input.

Tension at the firm now, however, undercurrents of uneasiness running through the grid of cubicles. However much AskUS promotes its community—and they have another word for that—programmers and higher ups in management lately have been looking at him askance, or it seems that way, as if he does not belong or is not holding up his end. He knows, however, he is not alone, and that there are other conflicts, unvoiced and unresolved. Most, the news has not been good. While they did receive favorable notice and had a successful IPO, they have been losing ground ever since. But no one gets anywhere looking back or second guessing, especially in Silicon Valley. Better not to express doubts but look ahead and maintain the spirit that got them started, which will sustain them now and on into the future. They will figure something out, as will he, whatever happens next.

Laundry detergent.

He is staring at half an aisle of detergents scented and scentless, plastic bottles in colors bright and subdued with pictures of arms and hammers and concentric circle targets and sunny beaches and mountain streams and bursts of light, with many different names and signs both subtle and direct, signs, names, and pictures of cleanliness and power and purity, plotting the way to domestic bliss.

“History, Willy, is a series of moveable stories told about the facts.”

To which Willy does not respond and William adds no further comment. He isn’t sure himself where the passion of reading meanings that moved them all at Stanford has left him now. Also he has forgotten what brand Miriam uses.

He studies the labels, hoping one will jog his memory. Most, though not all, say they contain no phosphates, the nourishment that once fed the algae explosion that choked our lakes and streams. Few say what they do have, however, and he wonders about their claims of environmental safety, especially when he notes the warnings on the back, the need to keep them out of the hands of small children, for which he makes a mental note. While he can get the unit price from the tag on the shelf, he can’t figure out which might be too harsh or so soft and safe that it may not do its job, whether any can actually deliver on its claims. Nothing rings a bell and he’s on his own.

“Which one, Willy?”

“Boo.” He lunges for the soft blue bottle with a picture of mountain streams.

“Good choice. You’re a boon companion, Willy.”

“Boom!”

“You screw up words on purpose, don’t you?”

“No way Jose!”

But he is good company, and William enjoys taking him along. His buoyant spirit, his ability to see the world with fresh surprise—Willy always lifts him and helps him see afresh himself. And there is another tendency that strikes him, the way Willy looks and ingests and pauses in rapt absorption, which may only be childish yet still is mysterious and possibly insightful, though which might develop into other tendencies later that might lead him astray when he is older, where William has some concerns. He has begun to worry about what will happen to Willy when he goes out into the world, what the world, in turn, will hold in store for him.

In many ways the world has come to them. So many different faces at the store, in the crowd—Pacific Rim and India and Eastern Europe, and even Middle East, which he does not remember from previous trips, and others whose origins he cannot place, their look and manner unfamiliar. A great many don’t appear to be entrepreneurs or engineers, in fact they do not look well off at all and their faces are rather grim. He wonders how they make it here, given how expensive this place has become. Some look like recent arrivals—the Chinese couple in front of him, elderly, the wife pushing the cart, the husband strolling with his hands clasped behind his back, his chest set gracefully forward in an open, accepting pose not occidental, who stares at an aisle with awe and maybe a little fear.

William understands his reaction because he feels the same when he sees what the man is looking at, nearly an entire aisle filled top to bottom with shampoos and conditioners and hair colors running the whole spectrum, options more varied and complex than those for detergents. He attempts some observation as to what might be concluded about all the attention to our hair, but gets a little dizzy. He is relieved shampoo is not on the list.

Fear turns to dread the next aisles. Condoms and tampons and douches and lubricants—how on earth will he explain these later?—treatments for infections of the feet and groin, wart removers and lice killers, digestive and sleep aids, a host of medicines for ailments of the head and stomach—who needs all this stuff, and why, and when, and how often?—razor blades and other body cutting tools, heavy duty cleaners with concentrations of bleach and ammonia he can smell, and poisons to kill ants and roaches and mice and rats. Again many brands, many choices, all with different claims and different signs and different colors, as well as many different warnings on the front, and as they pass by Willy reaches out right and left.

“Settle down back there.”

A supermarket, he thinks, is a minefield.

He continues down the list and across the store, working his way through the traffic of carts and around the shoppers who stand back to look, fending off the noise of all that calls to him and his wallet, the calling pushed up one notch more—sticking out in the aisles, coupon dispensers with flashing LEDs, where Willy snags a few.

“Settle down back there.”

Yet dread flies to sudden rapture when he drops his guard and lets the calling in and follows it where it takes him, to an elaborate, specialized physical world of special preservatives and boosters and enhancers, compounds that only a chemist could understand, all capable of God knows what; a sheer verbal universe with a language unto itself, its own way of spelling the names of its brandz and produx—Huggies, Jell-O, Drano, Nexxus, Gas-X, Durex, Zantac, Ex-Lax, Renuzit, and, at the head of one aisle, a special on Cheez-Its—and its own way of giving special meanings to ordinary words—Pampers, Depend, Resolve, Glad, Glade, Gentle Glide, and Joy—or which frees itself from conventional meanings and creates its own; a whole new culture, or cultures, or a multitude of cultures, with styles ranging from the delicate and floral and herbal to the unabashedly ramped up, with signs and pictures that point in all directions.

Such utter diversity of voices and choices competing freely with each other for his attention, and not just for his but for that of all the faces in the store from around the world and of anyone and everyone everywhere, taking him and them all to some special place, or places, or to seemingly infinite places unto themselves—it is empowering, and exhilarating, and still something else.

But after passing through three aisles of morgue-like freezers filled with packaged foods, he feels a chill and rapture falls to somber reflection.

There lie underneath, he knows, issues of limited resources and delicate balances in nature disrupted, and of labor, of working conditions and status, of distribution of wealth here and across the globe, which, if investigated, would raise many questions. Still, the exuberance is compelling and it is hard not to believe that something would remain after the leveling of such analysis, that there is some whole much greater than the sum of all the parts, or vastly, ecstatically less, or which has nothing to do with parts, a passion that cannot be dissected or suppressed.

What would Adam Smith have to say?

Or Karl Marx?

Yet the noise is overwhelming and rapture quickly falls to fatigue. It is the way he feels when makes a search at AskUS and scans the hundreds of pages it returns.

But ultimately it is his world—he is a salesman who sells ads, one link in the business chain—something he has always known but hasn’t fully let sink in. What he hasn’t realized until now is how much he is a stranger to this world, as much as he is to the one that feeds the stuff that churns through the banks of servers at AskUS night and day, the exuberance of information, the passion of the flow of bits and bytes, of all the pennies from all the clicks. What he still cannot fathom is the revelation at a meeting last week that has spread through the firm and set faces aglow, made without irony or qualification and accepted without reservation: advertising is AskUS’s mission.

“Settle down back there.”

While Wiliam is running down, Willy grows more restless. And heavier—it’s really time to move him to the grocery cart seat. He sees far enough ahead to avoid the racks with cheap plastic toys, but at the next aisle runs into candy, towards which Willy strains and grunts.

“Settle down back there.”

And has the same problem when he pushes past the sugared cereals.

“Settle down back there.”

Fortunately, bread is next, loaves with one to fifteen grains, a superfluity of wholesomeness and roughage. Also fortunately, the name of the kind he is supposed to buy is on the list. But it’s one he’s never liked—it goes down dry and hard—and, he suspects, costs a dollar more than it did the last time he made this trip.

There are other things about the list that do not sit well with him today.

Still, Miriam manages this world, or seems to, just as she seems to manage the world at AskUS, without strain or disbelief. She got on board a year after him and is a human resources partner there, another of the firm’s innovations, a position where she has freedom to cross the borders between departments. She opens up channels of communication and passes on complaints, as well as coaches employees up and down on conflict resolution techniques, all so AskUS can stay focused and together and everyone feels he belongs and she has input and a place. His path and hers, however, seldom cross, probably just as well.

And every day Miriam comes home satisfied, charged with purpose, more so lately, in spite of the tensions at the firm—or maybe because of them? He has always wondered how she does it, and why, what moves her, just as he wonders now how she has handled most of the shopping without wearing down and losing faith. He also wonders why she doesn’t realize what he himself was late in seeing, that the people they work with at AskUS are flakes.

The mistakes he makes shopping today will not be brought to his attention, yet he suspects somehow he will become aware of them, that they will be added to an unseen ledger, where he might be in the red.

But he is projecting. She never complains about anything or brings him up short. They have a good marriage

Yet what also sinks in today is that their marriage is settling down, new territory where he does not know his way around. There may be hidden problems and false perceptions that they could put aside the first years, now waiting to surface.

But he is speculating idly, perhaps stirring up trouble. All marriages have conflicts; moving past is what makes them stronger. Besides, he is almost done and is eager to leave and go home.

Meat, rows of it, however, freezes him, where he stares at all the packaged cuts, raw and frankly red. He is not used to seeing meat this way, and the meat seems to be staring back. But he doesn’t think about cows crammed into pens and stuffed with antibiotics, but rather about the war.

What has brought this to mind?

“In Guantanamo Bay—“

“Whackamollay!”

“What?”

“Whackamollay!”

“Oh, right. Guacamole. Guantanamo, guacamole. In Guantanamo Bay we strapped interrogees down and poured water over their faces, making them gag and think they were drowning. Glub! Glub! Glub!”

“Gub gub gub!”

“It’s called waterboarding. Test subjects with the CIA could only take it fifteen seconds. I don’t know if we do it anymore. I’d tell them anything they wanted, wouldn’t you?”

“No way Jose!”

“You’re a trouper, Willy. Good thing you don’t understand any of this.”

But he wonders if we are still doing it, and what else we might still be doing there now. And other images come to mind from Abu Ghraib, Saddam’s place of torture then ours, of the mass of naked bodies piled up beneath our smiling faces, of the man standing on a box wearing a grotesque parody of a Halloween costume, a quizzically pointed hood and ragged poncho-like cloak, with his arms splayed out in a suggestive pose, and on his fingers electrodes. Hovering over the images, the gross irony that no one there or higher up seemed to grasp.

He does not like the administration, of course, but at first he thought it harmless and believed the country could manage on its own. There was so much else going on, and we had our own energies to direct us. Still, when the Iraq invasion, mercifully quick, was over and the statue fell, he felt the relief we all did, that a toxin had been removed and the world could continue on its forward course.

But there has been an uneasy settling down the last years, and all kinds of things have surfaced since, here and there, in the Arab world itself with its sectarian passions, the violence that seems to feed itself.

What else might be hiding, waiting to be released?

And on top of the passions, theirs and ours, all the signs, both subtle and direct, of cleanliness and power and purity and global bliss, all the talk, years of it, all the arguments, all the pitches, our ascent into an abstruse world plotted by the technical details of our devices, and beyond, up into an abstract realm of strategies and initiatives and global action, the talk laced with its own brand of sentimental buzzwords that cut the spirit when they are heard.

What has he been thinking about all this time?

What has anyone thought?

He is glad to make the checkout stand at last but then stares at all the harried faces of our actors and singers and other personalities perched above the conveyor belt, appearing on the covers of the tabloids that headline their weight problems, under and over, their operations and divorces, their time in rehab. It wasn’t that long ago that they looked happy and healthy and seemed to be having a good time.

“Jesus, this country is screwed up.”

“Ease-us!”

“Sorry, Willy. I slipped again. No way, Jose.”

“No way Jose!”

He realizes he doesn’t know what anything is really worth.

Nor does he know what kind of shape the economy is in or what its signs actually mean, nor who is getting a fair shake or not, nor who is getting along with whom or isn’t, nor where any of us are headed.

He also wonders what else he needs to wonder about and realizes he doesn’t know that as well.

And he has no idea what he will do when AskUs goes under.

At the bank card machine, while he fumbles at the buttons, demoralized and tired, Willy reaches up and touches his hair, playing with it in lingering caress.

“Settle down back there.”

But William tries to remember the last time he was touched so softly, if ever.

.

Off center and by itself in the small box in the grid of weathered and colorless redwood fencing that encloses and separates the other backyards from each other, before the back of the nearly identical unit behind, in the midst of all the nearly identical units, modernish and nondescript, a jacaranda, the mesh of its many slender branches, gently crooked and slightly tortured, splaying outward away from themselves yet rising together to the late afternoon sun, a complex straining yet with single intent, and appearing everywhere at the ends of the branches, in spite of the unseasonable chill a cold front pushed in last night, or perhaps, in a sense, because of it, the tips of purple buds, barely visible and beyond counting, delicate and bracing.

There is wisdom in small things, she thinks.

The world is what it is.

There is no point in racking ourselves over the things we cannot change.

But there is a natural course in the world we can follow, if we learn to listen and do not force ourselves upon it.

And even if there isn’t, we might as well act as if there were.

What are the other options?

It is only by paying attention to small things that we have any hope of changing the large.

There is wisdom in small things.

Soon the suspense of buds will be released into a flurry of silent blossoms, seemingly weightless, floating like a mist, yet substantial, whose sight will make everything else around them fade and drift, immaterial. . . .

One should not lose sight of the present, and what Miriam turns to now is what to do about a husband who may be showing the signs of several years of stress. He is not alone, and she wonders why no one saw it coming. Taking care of present concerns is also the best way to deal with her own recent bouts with depression.

“What on earth am I supposed to do with these?”

She is staring at four tomatoes.

“No way Jose!”

Willy is sitting on the counter under a watchful eye, helping out.

“What’s that?”

“No way Jose!”

“Must be something you got up from your father. The salad doesn’t have to have tomatoes. Don’t tell him, OK?”

“No way Jose!”

“You’re a saint, Little Willy.”

Willy beams.

She puts the tomatoes on the window sill, just in case.

“Let’s see what we can do to pick your father up.”

At the small table in the kitchen, Willy sits between them in his highchair, his tray just above their plates. On the plates, the everyday plates, veal marsala, veal which had to be pounded into submission, and fettuccini, and to the side salad highlighting variations on green, everything lightly seasoned and carefully, casually placed. By the plates, crystal and a bottle of Merlot she had been saving—for what?

“You’re a wonder, Miriam.”

“It is nothing.”

He is trying, she thinks.

Willy pauses a moment to look and ponder, about, at the food before him, theirs and his from jars and boxes, a small pile of fettuccini and the veal she scraped of sauce and shallots and mushrooms and cut neatly into small pieces, small portions of the other she arranged around the plate. Then he gets down to business, sounding out the timbre of the plate with his fork, mixing and stirring and pushing food around, and picking up and testing it and debating and spitting it out and putting it back and picking up and testing once more and chewing, wholly absorbed and for the most part content.

William, however, only stares at his.

“No politics, no work,” she says.

“That is the problem.”

“What problem?”

“No politics, no work.”

“There is a time and place for everything.”

“When?”

He looks up, as if accusing her—of what?

“When one is fed and settled.”

“That is the problem.”

“What problem?”

“No politics, no work.”

 “Excuse me?”

“I’m not going to talk about politics or work at the table.”

“This isn’t like you,” she says.

“What?”

“Being cryptic and not eating.”

His face softens with apology, and he sets himself to eating as well, though without method or desire.

This one isn’t over.

She stops to consider a plan of action. She is not going to get into a fight. No beauty in victory and everyone loses in defeat. The best plan is no plan. It is only by not taking this head on, whatever it is, that it can be resolved. Step away and wait. Let him work on it himself. He will come back when he is ready.

It is the plan that has always worked, and when they do talk she brackets goals and leaves slots open for alternatives, and concedes and compromises where she can, then looks at what emerges. If they aren’t brought to closeness, they at least come to an agreement. Always take what you can get.

While Willy ups the tempo in his eating, William slows down, testing and debating, picking up and putting back, pushing around something else that must be stirring his stomach juice. Also the Merlot has taken a heavy hit.

This one, however, may be different.

She is not going to be the counselor: she is his wife. Besides, it isn’t easy for her to step into the role herself. Not that she doesn’t put her heart into her work, but there are things she says and does at work, the platitudes, the playacting, that she can only provisionally accept and in which does not invest great belief. It is what is behind them that counts, and where they might lead. They are only props, and what matters more is the effort. What matters most is what will be left when the props are removed, what will stand on its own.

Sometimes, however, all she can see are the props, and it seems all she does is put them up. But at least they are there, holding up. Always take what you can get.

As for AskUS, you have to start somewhere, and it doesn’t matter where you start. You might as well work at a place where there is support and some spirit, and the wherewithal to get something done. Their enthusiasm can be forgiven. Even if they mouth virtuous words, there might yet be a way to make them take hold and stick. As for AskUS’s future, thinking about it will not get her anywhere now.

But she has always admired the distance William keeps and wonders how he does it, how he sets the look of confidence and fends off uncertainty, how he manages not to get swept in and carried off.

There are times she feels that if all the props were removed, everything would collapse.

She realizes she is not eating, either.

“For heaven’s sake, let it out.”

“We are a nation of idiots,” he says, still staring at his plate.

“Willy, William.”

Willy, however, is still busy eating.

“I didn’t vote for them and you didn’t either.”

“They’re not the only ones I have in mind.”

“Who else, then?”

He looks at her but doesn’t answer, his face caught between outrage and bemusement without finding either.

“I don’t know why it’s taken me so long to learn this, and I still have trouble believing it. Whenever people do mean and stupid and petty things, it’s not because they’re trying to be mean or stupid or petty but because they’re trying to do what they think is right.”

He says instead.

“Why is that so alarming?”

“It means they will never stop to realize they are mean and stupid and petty, so they will keep on doing mean and stupid and petty things, and do so with conviction and clean conscience.”

“What is new here?”

“We keep finding new ways to fool ourselves.”

“I don’t like the way things are going in this country any more than you do, but we won’t get anywhere by calling the people who run it idiots. We don’t have all the answers ourselves. And even if they are being stupid, we demean ourselves when we stoop to their level.”

“If we don’t, who will?”

“Besides, dismissing them as idiots takes us out of any discussion with them and gives them free rein.”

“They have it anyway.”

“We can look for common ground.”

“What common ground?”

“We can set the example of being reasonable ourselves and give them a chance to follow.”

“They will think us the fools.”

“Then we can let the force of our arguments persuade them, not the bitterness of our invective.”

“They won’t know what we’re talking about.”

He looks back down at his plate, still stirring.

This one isn’t going anywhere and it’s getting there fast.

She respects his opinion and has always felt he is more perceptive than she, and smarter. But there are times when she doesn’t know where he is, when she isn’t sure he knows himself, yet for some reason she pictures now a hooded man with bent head and helpless arms, standing on a little box.

He is being evasive.

He has always supported her.

Evasion is a form of attack.

He loves her.

He is attacking her.

He never judges her.

What has she done wrong?

Let it go, she thinks.

She continues. Something might yet be salvaged.

“We can at least take care of ourselves and see what we can create for those around us.”

“We don’t have all the answers.”

“It is not always easy to know what is right, but we make the best choices we can and hope for the best.”

“We might do more harm than good.”

“Then at least let us not be stupid ourselves and not do stupid things.”

“What if we are the idiots?”

“Then we can look to those around us and follow their example.”

“It is blindness.”

“It is vision.”

“It is a way to be led by the nose.”

“It is sanity.”

“It is a way to let the monsters in.”

“They already seem to be here. Jesus Christ, William, you’re being perverse.”

“No way Jose!”

Why is Willy looking at her? Was she the one who raised her voice? And now William looks at her and shows the same face.

“The problem with this country is that it lacks perspective,” he says.

 “The problem with this country is that it doesn’t believe in itself,” she says, softly, she thinks, but she doesn’t know where she is headed.

“It believes in itself too much,” he says, his face moving to a clearness, beyond irony and rage.

“This country doesn’t believe in anything,” she says, still softly, and realizes she believes it.

“This country believes in everything.”

“It doesn’t love itself.”

“It loves itself too much.”

“This country hates itself,” she says, and realizes all three might be true.

She also realizes she is lost.

“No way Jose!”

And she may have raised her voice again.

“Willy, I’m sorry. Willy, William.”

“This country doesn’t hate itself enough,” he says, ignoring her plea.

“No way Jose!”

Now Willy looks at him, but William doesn’t notice.

“The country has lost its self-respect,” she says, softly, she is sure.

“No way Jose!”

But Willy looks at her.

“The country has never respected anything,” he shouts.

“No way Jose!”

“The country is too aggressive,” she barely whispers.

“No way Jose!”

“The country is too passive,” he shouts again.

“No way Jose!”

 “The problem with this country is that it is a self-absorbed prick.”

Did she say that?

“The problem with this country is that it is a passive-aggressive bitch.”

Did he?

But then there is a wordless bawl, and she collapses over Willy, and William joins her, both with a flurry of gentle hands.

.

It took him a long time to convince Mom and Dad that he was asleep, and even longer to be certain that whatever attacked them had finally left the room. He stares at the ceiling, at the many fluorescent stars, now fading, which they stuck up there to serve as a night-light and stimulate his imagination, but which, quite frankly, have always frightened him.

When he closes his eyes, he sees afterimages of other stars, and of targets and mountain streams and sunny beaches and flowers and bursting lights, and of bright and subtle colors, and along with these a multitude of strange signs and strange words, strangely subtle and subtly direct, all presided over by a vision of that open-mouthed cherub of astonishment who has appeared on jars and boxes of his food all this time and whose name, apparently, is Gerber.

There is much to think about.

He doesn’t know why Mom and Dad thought they had hurt him or what moved them to shower him with affection.

But always take what you can get.

He also wonders why they don’t say what they mean when they talk to each other instead of beating around the bush.

Or maybe they don’t know what they mean to say but are doing the best they can?

Then again, maybe they did say exactly what they meant. In which case, he wonders it means, what kind of country it is he lives in that it could contain so many marvelous contradictions.

There are other questions he cannot answer.

If the good people who make all the products we consume want us to have them so much, why don’t they just give them to us? Why go to so much trouble?

Maybe if they didn’t put on such a show we wouldn’t want them?

Or are they hiding something, and the products are not worth having, but we have to be fooled into believing that they are?

Or is the lavish attention they pay us really what matters, and the products themselves, somehow, are beside the point?

And why, in Guacamole Bay, would we strap a man down and fake drowning him instead of doing the real thing? Wouldn’t that be easier?

Then again, if there is something we want to know, why don’t we just ask someone else, or better yet, find out ourselves?

Or maybe if we jazzed up our asking with glitzy slogans and flashy smiles and offered two-for-one, then he’d want to talk?

But maybe we really don’t want to know anything and the strapping down is what matters.

In spite of the obvious differences, the more he thinks about both situations, the more he sees similarities. But trying to find a connection makes him really dizzy and hurts his head, and he has to give this one up as well.

He wonders, too, what other kids his age stare at on their ceilings and what they see when they close their eyes.

He wonders what their parents talk about.

He wonders what all parents talk about, when their kids aren’t there to listen.

And he wonders what else exists in our country that might attack them.

Most, he wonders if anyone gets along.

One thing seems fairly certain, though, that life will only get more difficult, and not less.

For some reason he feels he is standing on an enormous box and he doesn’t know how to get down. And the stars continue to dim, and the darkness grows darker, and everything is dissolving into uncertainty, and sleep is pulling him and he is weary and afraid, and as he keeps staring at the ceiling, all his questions fade as well into this wish, that there might be someone out there who could ease us.

.

.

The Clinic

.

I went to doctors all over town, and they couldn’t help me. My wife got tired of hearing me complain. I even got tired of hearing myself complain. I had reached the stage where I only had to pick up a racket for the pain to start, a sharp shooting pain that felt like a pin had been stuck through my shoulder. And when my damn arm really did begin to hurt, I finally had to give it up.

I never understood tennis anyway. The game was like some rite into which I had never been initiated. Whatever happened between the serve and the end of the point was a mystery of motion and involvement. I felt as if each time I slammed the ball into my opponent’s court I had touched off the release of a sudden fury that I could only fluster my way through in some awful kind of waltz.

The moment still comes back to me, when I’m facing a new client in the office, sometimes when I’m just walking uptown against the crowd, where I’ve charged the net and stand waiting for the return, tense, poised, and anxious—

I don’t know which makes us more miserable, the things we do from commitment and obligation, or those we do for joy.

Still, I’m sorry I quit. Somehow I think that if I had mastered the game I might be a better person for it today, more in control, more on top of things. I was too impatient: I didn’t get set, I rushed my strokes. Hell, I don’t need a psychiatrist. What I need now was a good pro, back then. I could serve, though, and hard. I will say that about my game. Win with your serve, and you only have to break your opponent’s once to take the set.

But how can you try to save the world if you don’t have a decent backhand?

The deal, at any rate, was this: if the kids stuck the program out for the summer, the Association would let them keep the shoes and rackets. They had to have the shoes. Even though Kirkwood Center was a public facility, it had good courts, which required some care. And that was my job back then, summers before I went to law school, collecting the fees, maintaining the courts—and trying to keep the public from tearing them up. Half those kids showed up the first day in street shoes. I doubt any of them had even been on a tennis court before.

The clinic was the brainchild of a local branch of the SLTA, though I don’t know why it’s called the Southern Lawn Tennis Association, because I’ve never seen a grass court anywhere in the South. There used to be a lot of clay, not the soft, grayish composition we had that everyone calls clay now, but thick red clay like the stuff that lies an inch below everywhere in the state. Even some of those raw little country towns with nothing more than a gas station and a post office used to have one or two of the old courts. It’s amazing, though, how many good players they produced. You could always spot them at the state tournament by the faint orange stain in their socks and shoes and the deep red crescent above their collars.

And I don’t know what the Association thought they could accomplish with their clinic, but then reform was in the air then—this was some twenty-five years ago, back in the 60s—and everyone was trying to do something, one way or the other. Better, maybe their reasoning, to show those kids something civil before someone else got to them. Maybe they wanted to turn them into proper Southern gentlemen. Really, I doubt they put much thought into their reasons, or their motives.

I suppose they meant well enough, though, and responded from within their means. They were, after all, a tennis association, tennis was what they understood, and tennis was what they offered. And they weren’t really a bad crowd. Nothing that snotty or exclusive about them—white collar, blue collar, even a few blacks, along with the guys who forked out ten grand a year at the Club. Everyone who played joined. You didn’t even have to be good at the game, you only had to show it a certain respect and take it seriously.

Too seriously, some of them. There were players for whom the game was an infernal labor, and it didn’t matter how good they were, their agony began the second they stepped on the court to pay penance for their fall from a heaven presided over by Bill Tilden. And tennis could bring out the worst side of others. Staid and sober men would cuss and hurl their rackets into the net with every mishit and bad shot they made. Line calls could become matters of personal injury, of righteous indignation. There would be moments when play on all courts stopped as everyone turned to watch someone who, having stormed from his side of the court to his opponent’s, stood over the tape, lowered his racket to a welter of ball marks, and then shouted for all he was worth that the one touching the line was his, as if the whole of an unfair world had reached consummation in a single point. It’s a fine line, I suppose, that separates justice from perversion.

Still, they all kept playing, they all managed to get along. And they all played at Kirkwood. Even the guys who belonged to the Club would put in an appearance. It was a community, of sorts.

At least they did know how to plan. The Association made the arrangements and had everything mapped out to the last day of summer. Members volunteered to teach and donated the rackets and balls, while a sporting goods store chipped in the shoes. An elaborate schedule was devised that allowed for rotations and substitutes so that there would be at least six instructors each day. God knows what they had in mind, because they even arranged to enter the kids in the city’s juniors tournament at the end of August.

The problem was that they didn’t know where to find the kids. They went to Parks and Recreation, who had the courts, who went to the Human Relations Council, who didn’t have anything but knew to call Social Services, who did have kids, who went to the Housing Authority, who had the bus. And, of course, Parks and Recreation knew where to find me, the public servant, and told me to have the courts in tournament shape for the first day.

I ran players off late morning so I could get them ready, sweeping twice, up and down and then across, pulling like a plow horse a large two-handled broom behind me. Then I brushed off the tapes, bringing into sharp relief the outlines of middle class obsession, given the clarity and dedication that only geometry can bring, and stood back to admire my work: so many different, well proportioned rectangles within larger rectangles laid out on a pristine gray-green field, bisected by eight nets stretched taut and tapered towards the center straps that I adjusted daily by the accepted and unimpeachable measurement, the length of a Jack Kramer plus the width of its face. Tennis, at last liberated from the dark halls of European aristocracy, from the back yards of the elite, into the wide open spaces of American democracy.

Then at noon, the bus came, on time, an old wreck, a converted school bus with “Brookview Homes” stenciled on the side. The driver squeezed out first, a fat cracker Baptist with a crew cut, who walked around while rubbing his hands together, surveying the place with ponderous skepticism. Next he looked for the nearest shade tree, beneath which he spent the rest of the summer sipping cokes and humming hymns to himself.

For a moment I wondered if the Association hadn’t found their kids after all, because from where I was standing the bus looked empty, but, as if on some unseen cue, they poured out the doors, twenty or so, and went straight for the courts. They ran helter-skelter all over them, cutting and scraping the surface with their leather and hard-soled basketball shoes. Some swung imaginary bats as they ran, while others sat on and tugged at the nets. Then a group lined up at one end, took a running start, and slid as far as they could in the grit, trying to see who could make the longest mark.

Needless to say, the kids were all black. When anyone talked about society back then, they meant problems, and problems meant race, and race meant black.

And these were raw kids. Not mean, not vicious, just raw. They were supposed to be ten to fourteen, but some looked older and much larger. Most had on jeans and ratty t-shirts several sizes too big. Their hair was cut close to the skull, and they all seemed to have a scar somewhere on them, which they wore with indifference. All their faces looked as if they had been scrubbed clean of any design or emotion, leaving only a lean, stark gaze. When they looked at you they had a way of looking through you, at some point beyond, as if you were in their way. If they were the ones the would-be reformers targeted for whatever had moved them, their anxieties or good will, the kids didn’t seem to know it.

The instructors herded them up, explained the business about the shoes, and gave a brief lecture on court etiquette. Then they took them to the storage room to pass out the equipment. The equipment should have been what tipped me off about their scheme, if I hadn’t been suspicious already. The shoes were mostly odd sizes and styles the store couldn’t unload. They had to stuff toilet paper in some to make them fit. Most of the balls you could squeeze together, and the rackets made for an odd and sorry arsenal. Ladies rackets. Sears rackets. Beginners rackets, feeble things, thin framed and loosely strung, the kind of rackets plumbers and hacks use, or the kind your father first buys you when he wants to see whether or not you’re going to take to the game, but obviously doesn’t want to blow too many bucks. And warped old models, relics from the attic, strung with brown, sagging gut, sporting on their throats pictures of players I’d never heard of.

It was the metal, though, that the kids went after, and a couple of fights broke out over who got them. There were about a half-dozen, aluminum and steel rackets with bright chrome or gold finishes, and all were split or had popped rivets. They were just coming out then and didn’t last long. The sound one made whenever a kid struck the ball was unnerving, like a cracked bell.

The equipment was serviceable in one respect, however, because after the instructors led them back on the courts to begin the lesson, it didn’t take them ten minutes to knock every one of some two hundred balls clear over the fence, and the rest of the hour was spent finding them. I had to stay late that night, filling in and sweeping over all the marks those kids had left.

The next day and the rest of the week the instructors managed something that resembled order, though not as much so tennis. I suppose from some perspective it might have looked funny, watching the staunch and not so staunch Southern fathers try to tame so many wild kids. Then again, I can’t imagine what that point of view might be, because even though the kids settled down somewhat, the instructors grew increasingly on edge. You could see it, as some leaned over the net and spoke to the kids with exaggerated politeness, or others just stood there and looked above their heads, working to regain composure, that their patience was being strained, as was some principle or reservation within they hadn’t resolved, perhaps were seeing for the first time. The kids picked up on the instructors’ frustration, though maybe misreading it, and they followed their advice as if being punished, sullenly hitting the ball and not caring whether it cleared the net or landed hard in the back fence. They had probably seen this routine before.

The second week substitutes had to be called in.

The third week was the start of the worst heat wave we’d had in decades. Eight days running the high hit over a hundred. The sun blared like a warning throughout the town, stirring memories of other summers and other cities, reminding us that though we had been spared the worst so far, the problems of society were not over yet. A curfew was reinstated on the coast, and there was an incident here, a police shooting in the projects, that had everyone talking about riots. This was the sense, that the unrest was some external contagion, bred in the Newarks and Watts’, not related to anything anyone was doing in the South, or to what had been going on all along for so long.

The courts dried out by noon and turned to dust that puffed up when a ball hit, or swirled in clouds with the slightest breeze. Just playing those days was challenge enough, but for the instructors the dust and heat were the catalysts that sped the transformation of their resolve into something else. Whatever magnanimity or faith the Association brought to the clinic soon turned to the look of grim tolerance.

They ran out of substitutes the fourth week, and the fifth week, with a show of excuses and apologies and complaints, there was wholesale desertion. Williams said he had to go on a business trip for a few days and never returned. Horton said it was a damn fine thing they were trying to do the day before he ducked out. McIntyre didn’t think tennis was the game for this kind of kid. Cowens wanted to know if there were any poor white kids in town. Brauer asked how they could take over where the kids’ parents had failed. Johnson was profuse in his apology and confessed he couldn’t take any more. Morehead simply quit, saying he didn’t have to give a reason. Dr. Greenfeld and Lucas, a black PE teacher, alone were quiet; but whatever their silence covered, both showed up every Monday for the rest of the summer.

Still, the kids kept coming, in fact, perversely, more of them came each week. And the bus kept coming, each day on schedule, as if nothing were wrong, bringing more and more kids to fewer and fewer instructors. The sixth week started with forty kids and just Greenfeld and Lucas, who somehow managed. Tuesday, only one instructor showed up, who could only handle a few and had to ignore the rest. The rest tried to carry on by themselves, but soon tired of that. One group started up a baseball game behind the locker room, using their rackets as bats. Another used them to attack bees swarming over the trash cans. I had to spend the hour running around to make sure the others, scattering all over the place, didn’t do anything worse. Wednesday no instructor came, but before I realized that, a handful had already taken off across the park and into the neighborhood.

The calls finally made their way to Wilson, our boss, the director of Parks and Recreation, a man who had a talent for appearing sufficiently harried in his job—when you could find him—and who bragged he’d never taken an hour’s exercise in his life. The next morning he met with Larry, the guy I worked with, and me at the Center. Wilson expressed his irritation at having been dragged from his office with a look down at the heavy wing-tip he ground into the grit on one court. The clinic, he let us know, wasn’t his idea, and he wouldn’t have approved of it had anyone asked him. However, he said, these were dangerous times. One had to be careful and appearances had to be kept up. Besides, he wasn’t going to let the botched efforts of others mar the image of his department. The clinic had started and was going to continue as planned. Against the Association itself or its instructors, however, he said nothing specific, and stared at us in a way that told us we shouldn’t, either. With a side-glance he suggested it would be an awfully fine gesture if Larry and I both be there at noon that day, even though we worked opposite shifts, to take over the lessons in case the instructors didn’t show up again. He then looked at us with a scowl we later decided meant there damn well better not be any talk about extra pay.

If any instructors intended to come back, they didn’t bother that afternoon, the following, or any other, aside from the conscientious Monday duo. I never found out if the Association pushed Wilson to get them off the hook, but doubt they did. Rather, this was just the way it happened, the way these things always happen, that messes are made and left for others to clean up. That, after all, is the reason here why government is created. The instructors eventually did return, but after work and weekends, this time to play, and Larry and I both got heavy looks that showed perhaps the anger that covers guilt, or maybe indignation that what we were finally doing was what we should have been doing from the start.

At any rate, we had their clinic now, a few hours after we talked to Wilson, and kept it for the rest of the summer. I don’t remember what Larry felt, but I was furious. Not only were we given an impossible task, not only did we have the Association’s half-baked scheme dumped on us, but I also felt as if we had been called upon to mediate the whole town’s failing conscience. Also, I didn’t know the first thing about teaching tennis.

Yet there we were, with all those kids, and I can still see not them but their life, its starkness, its otherness, and the distance and utter difference. Then as now, I was a liberal, but then as now, I wasn’t a sap. What they had gone through none of us could understand, and the only thing I knew with certainty was that what they needed would take more than manners and games we hadn’t learned ourselves.

Still, there we were, with all those kids, and we had to do something. Larry and I split them up, Larry taking half to the back courts, while I assembled the rest on the front. And then there I was, now alone with those kids, all eyes on me, and I didn’t know what to say. I looked back at them, restless under the noon sun, feeling awfully white and a little scared.

“You’ll probably find,” I told them with the only inspiration that came, “that the forehand is easier to learn. But don’t be afraid of the backhand. It’s supposed to be the more natural stroke.” I then demonstrated both, taking a few unsteady swings at invisible balls. A couple of them repeated the strokes with me, but stopped when the others glared. I didn’t know what they had already learned so decided to start from scratch. Mustering courage, I next showed them the serve and volley. No one cared about my work at the net, but several were impressed with my serve and gave it a shot. Next I broke them up into groups among the courts and told them to take turns hitting to each other, trying to get them to rally—and failing. They only went through the motions without moving balls back and forth across the nets. Larry fared about as well.

Yet this became the program the following weeks because it was the only one I could figure out that might be appropriate for their level, demonstration followed by practice. Not that I saw results or had any confidence in my plan, because even the instructors who had tried and did know what they were doing hadn’t gotten anywhere. Then again, the half-hearted effort of the others must have left the kids confused and the desertion had to have had some effect. Still, I had to do something. After I broke them up into groups, I’d go from court to court, giving advice to anyone who listened. Mostly, they ignored me, treating me like an intruder. Really, though, it didn’t make any difference what I did, because as I gingerly worked my way through the desultory groups, stepping on balls, getting stares, I also kept an eye myself on the park outside and the houses across the street. Because this had to be the unspoken directive from Wilson, not to teach but keep them out of trouble.

Maybe the Association did mean well, but so what? It doesn’t matter what their intentions were, because fickle behavior can do more harm than good. But to say the road to our modern hell is paved with good intentions would be giving too many people too much credit. It’s hard to believe the Association’s real purpose on some broader scale wasn’t the same as Wilson’s. And this was what angered me most, that I was I one who got stuck to fulfill it.

I suppose if I had protested loud enough, I could have gotten out, though I couldn’t imagine any argument I might make that wouldn’t sound selfish or dumb. And much as I resented the clinic, leaving it wouldn’t have felt right. It’s the problem you run into when you go against the words behind the words. But if I didn’t complain it was because I lacked the nerve, and for no better reason saw the clinic through to the end. Yet it was hard to hold any conviction in doing something that not only didn’t have a chance but I also didn’t believe in. My only solution to this dilemma was to fake engagement without thinking about society or its problems or its motives and what lay beneath them, and try to make the lessons as interesting as I could, as much for myself as them.

The kids, of course, remained bored; their rallying got even worse. So I was surprised when a couple of kids said they wanted to play for real and demanded I explain how to keep score, as if I were holding out or keeping a secret from them. I was saving that for last, and really didn’t care if we got to it or not. Matches are tedious and dull until you learn to keep the ball in play. Also, scoring in tennis is complicated—fifteen-love, fifteen-all, thirty-fifteen, but next, the way we said it, forty-five; deuce, ad in, ad out; game, set, and match—and as I explained these details, the whole business sounded strange and silly. Still, they picked it up, and quicker and better than anything else I told them. Then I turned them loose to compete. With the numbers, I had to improvise, setting up singles on one court and doubles, triples, and worse on the others. But while the kids didn’t hit any better and it was hard to say that what they were doing was tennis—the way they played, a set could take five minutes or last into the next century—they played with a passion approaching frenzy, a relief from so many days of heat and boredom.

And the rules. They wanted to know the rules—all of them. I had to pull out the book. It wasn’t long before I heard the shout: “Footfault, you cocksucker!” Footfaults. They called each other on footfaults. Nobody called footfaults there—it’d start a fight. Even in serious match play, learning rules is as much a matter of knowing which to follow as well as which you’re supposed to ignore. How could I explain that?

I think it would have been easier for me if someone had donated tennis shirts and shorts as well. Not that I care about decorum, but some appearances count for something. Also the clothes might have smoothed the edges of some of the rougher guys. Yet I don’t know why I was intimidated by them. That harsh gaze of theirs—but maybe they didn’t trust me as well. And after a while I realized that they weren’t really looking at me or at anything. They simply weren’t looking, as if I or anything else beyond a point in their vision had only uncertain existence. Nor did they seem to know each other, even after being together almost two months. I’d ask why someone dropped out and they’d say they didn’t know him. The next day, however, someone else—or two—would come to take his place.

I suppose I got sucked in somewhat, because, standing on the sideline shouting and cheering them on or entering a match to give advice, I began paying more attention to what was going on within the fence than what might happen without. Not that I got involved, it was just hard to see them play and not have the strokes down. They still didn’t listen, but I got used to that. What was harder was when they did—and I did get a small following—because then the burden fell on me to teach them what I wasn’t so sure about myself. And when they repeated what I showed them, I grew self-conscious about my own game, seeing my form mimicked by several kids in unison, more often than not exaggerated. But I had to wince when I saw the kinks in my backhand so faithfully repeated. Then again, in watching them copy me, I saw what I was doing wrong: I was hitting down on the ball and chopping at it instead of lifting it smoothly with a full follow-through. It is the natural stroke, swinging away from the body.

What hurt most was seeing a few take interest in the game. Even with the right environment, tennis is tough to break into. When you start out there’s little return for your efforts, and however much you practice, it always seems you’re doing more wrong than right. I resisted my father’s attempts for so many years that he finally gave up on me. I didn’t take the game seriously until I was in high school, and it still took several years before I played well enough to feel comfortable on a court. But even after you’ve played a long time and think you have a stroke grooved, you find days when it doesn’t work. The game’s all control and concentration. Luck counts for nothing. And when you think about all that has to be put together just to execute a single swing, then consider that you have to repeat it consistently, hundreds of times throughout a match, you realize that beating somebody is really beside the point. You look for a rhythm to carry you and try not to get too upset for a while.

But then the kids would never even know that much, because the city hadn’t yet put any courts on their side of town. And even if they did have courts, they wouldn’t have gotten far without some guidance. Yet the Association wasn’t going make the same mistake twice by following the clinic up the next summer—and didn’t.

None of which should have been news to them. And if they didn’t know from the start, they had to have realized soon that whatever they did that summer would be as far as they went with tennis. Still they kept coming, though I don’t know why. I don’t think the game even appealed to that many. I don’t know why they came in the first place. Tennis was still a white game, maybe they wanted to break a barrier, though I doubt they thought on those terms. Maybe they came because the same system that built their housing, paid their mothers’ checks, and tried to keep them in school no matter what they learned had designed another way to contain them, so when bus rolled up and opened its doors, they decided they were supposed to get in.

Or maybe they didn’t have anything else to do.

My concern about match play was borne out. After a few weeks, despite my encouragement, their initial fervor died down to a mechanical keeping of the score. To spark motivation, I told them about how well Ashe was doing that summer, and they didn’t know who I was talking about. I showed them a picture in Tennis, and one kid said, “Him? He’s a—he’s a colored boy.” If he didn’t use the other word, it may have been a sign they were beginning to accept me, or at any rate had gotten used to having me around. It was the first time I realized that not only was race in their heads, too, but that they had their hang-ups about it as well.

The picture of Ashe, however, was only good for a day, and towards the end I had to work harder to keep them going—

Except with one kid, who never let up—

Rudy.

This kid was intense, and I don’t think he took his eyes off me the entire summer. He was a lanky kid who never smiled, who moved with a hitch and a stalk. And he not only looked mean, he was mean, but I suppose he had to be because of his hand. He only had one hand, or rather his left was clubbed or mangled. It must have been a birth defect—he only had the vestiges of fingers—but I never looked at it closely. I didn’t want him to think I noticed.

Rudy paid absolute attention to me, nodding anxiously at whatever I showed him, and then repeating it vigorously until I told him he had it right. Not that he ever did, but I think he would have kept me the whole hour, repeating myself, if I didn’t make the excuse of needing to go on to the others. Really, I just wanted a break. He had a way of fixing and bearing down on you as if his eyes were guns. I felt I was always in their sights, even when we weren’t on the same court, even when he had gone home for the day.

Jesus, that kid scared me.

When he wasn’t tracking me down, he was maneuvering on the other courts to get the best to play against him and whatever partner he could find. Tennis is one of the few one-handed games. Maybe that was the attraction.

We worked out a serve, though I can’t imagine how he managed the toss since he couldn’t hold a ball with his left. I never could get him to stop running around his backhand.

Rudy aside, the final week the kids not only showed no life in their play, but also had lost their wildness. It was as if their spirit had been beaten out of them. While I couldn’t fault myself and knew where to place blame, I still felt guilty. After all, in a sense I was involved—so many weeks of taming them for nothing. Yet they still showed up, except the last day when we passed out the shoes and rackets. Then only half of them came. Larry and I thought some sort of ceremony was in order, but after we fumbled a few minutes while they stared at the ground, they got on the bus and we didn’t see them again—

No, seven came back two weeks later, for the juniors tournament. Wilson said we had to stick with the Association’s original plan, though we argued the experience would be bad for them. Tennis is hard enough in informal matches; tournament play is a different game altogether. The ball bounces differently. It requires a different set of nerves. On the grit, your coordination, your composure—everything can slip out from under you quickly. The kids didn’t have much to support them and had a long way to fall.

We did what we could, waiving the entry fees and even rigging the draw so that none of our kids would have to go up against the top seeds. Maybe we even fooled ourselves into thinking a few of them at least had a shot at close matches. There weren’t that many kids in town with talent, and most of the entrants weren’t far themselves from beginners. But our vision had been blurred by having spent so much time with our kids. It was a shock just seeing them scattered on the courts with all the white kids in tennis whites, who, good or not, flashed tennis in every move they made, as if the game were in their genes. They, the whites, were polite, but then they could afford to be. They blew our kids off the courts. Hard not to wonder if that wasn’t what the Association, at least unconsciously, had wanted from the start. Even if not, the effect was just the same.

Not that poor kids can’t learn, that’s not the point. There are real clinics in the ghettoes now, and shoe companies are pulling black talent out of college for their harems, luring them with big bucks. And if blacks ever got bored with basketball, you wouldn’t see a white guy again on center court. But what does this prove? That blacks can play other sports? They’re only draining their energy into entertaining the world without tapping into its power.

And winning championships, being the best isn’t what’s important. What matters is everybody else. From the smallest local tournament to Forest Hills, we live in a pyramid of competition that recognizes only the single winner and turns the rest into losers. We don’t need games to prove our insignificance. We don’t need to find our place, what we need is a place where we can get out of ourselves—

Rudy made it past the first round, the one-handed kid.

His opponent wasn’t white, he was pink, and spoiled rotten. His parents must have dropped over a hundred dollars on his clothes and racket, not to mention what they paid for lessons at the Club. His mother stood beside me on the porch, all agog in admiration of her little prince as he stretched out at the net, who, staying there, took practice swings, showing his good club form, while Rudy waited to begin the warm-up. But when His Highness finally made his way to the base line, he declared he was ready to play.

Rudy wasn’t pretty to watch, and it drove me crazy to see him still running around his backhand. Yet he ran like the devil, managing to cover the whole court, chasing down every ball, returning it in whatever way he could fashion. Not that he returned that many, because he lost the first set quickly. Nonetheless, he made the mother nervous. The first time Rudy hit that serve we worked out, she turned to me and asked, “He can’t do that, can he?”

There was a tense moment in the second set, when the pink kid hit a ball just out—I saw the mark. Rudy walked up to the line and stood over it in silence, as if afraid of it, but then hollered “Out!” The pink kid puffed up, his mother grabbed my arm, and Rudy turned and stared into the porch at me. From his expression, I couldn’t tell whether he wanted me to confirm his call or was daring me to defy it. Not a line judge, of course I couldn’t say anything. After that call, he just shouted and ignored me. And his game picked up from there.

The other kid did have the strokes, but he didn’t have the head. When he approached the net, Rudy lobbed over him. When he played back, Rudy chopped the ball short, where it skipped and dribbled a few times before rolling to the kid’s feet. And Rudy kept dogging him, finding his weaknesses, until the pink kid’s game fell apart.

1-6, 9-7, 6-0.

The match over, the pink kid ran to his mother, shunning the handshake at the net. Both looked hurt and offended, as if they both had been cheated. Rudy stayed where he was, alone in the middle of the court while matches continued around him. I was ecstatic, yet Rudy looked mad, and bore down with his eyes not on me or the kid or the mother, but on the court itself, fixing himself in the intersection of all those meaningless lines.

Or maybe he was just waiting for things to settle down, because in another moment he broke into a smile and walked off.

It’s not a bad game. There’s not that much people can do together to let off a little steam without someone getting hurt. There’s not that much people can do together at all. And every now and then, after you’ve given up worrying about how well you’re doing, maybe for a brief and passing moment you experience a feeling that is almost marvelous. You’re on the court, but you’re not aware of it, because you’re caught up in the cadence of the fall-bounce-swing of play. The weight and beat of your heart become absorbed into the pressure of the ball against the strings and then are released in its flight over the net, as it plots a trajectory arcing somewhere between the coordinates of elation and despair. You give in and lose yourself to the feeling because you know you are not giving anything up—

Latham.

We had one player at the courts—Morris Latham. Conqueror of the South in his prime, he even made it to the quarters at Wimbledon. But I don’t care about his record, it was the way he looked, the way he hit the ball. Much as I’ve tried to put all that Southern crap behind me, there has to be something redeeming about this place, because only the South could have produced a Latham. On the court his manner was reserved, almost withdrawn, and he had a stoic look on his face that belied his clean, powerful shots, the smooth, easy grace of his swing. And he did it—hit that way—every single time. But not even that—

His backhand . . . was gorgeous. Pure, simple, seemingly effortless. Yet still not there, but somewhere between the time he snaps his head and racket back together, recoiling in anticipation of the bounce, and the time the ball meshes with the strings, in that fraction of a second that he stands there waiting, accepting, gravely holding at arm’s length a universe of infinite possibilities of all the possible paths, spins, and turns of the ball—it’s there you felt a surge inside as if the world were being drawn to a balance, and watching him you could almost believe that there were such a thing as grace.

Of course there isn’t. Even if there were, you couldn’t teach, much less learn or comprehend it. The essence of grace would lie in its rarity, in its inexpressible beauty.

The world doesn’t turn on my opinion, but I don’t think things are any better. There has been some change, but not much beyond what we have covered by the smile of our guilt, the shadow of our good intentions. We only have to look at the riots last year in LA to see what has been kept under the lid. As for us, I don’t think we can make laws fast enough to keep us from tearing each other apart.

The pink kid is probably out of law school now, climbing the ladder in a big firm. No telling what happened to Rudy. Not much hope for a kid like that.

I think I got him to pin the ball against the throat of the racket with his bad hand, and he tossed by throwing hand, racket, and ball up in the air and letting go.

Jesus, he could serve, and hard!

.

Nocturne

.

.

. . . after I go to bed but before I fall asleep and begin to dream, after I drop the mask of my profession and at last relax the grip my work holds over me dur­ing the day, the way it has me think and speak, I am freed to an elu­sive and indistinct group of selves, that scattered collection of memories and faces and feelings which linger behind my thoughts like many faint, overlapping shadows cast from an object by many faint points of light but which together join to form the only shape and substance that carries my name, and I listen in the dark to the sounds outside my bedroom window, trying to remember who I am and where I have been, to think how I fit in the order of things that fit together, the order of things that do not, the order of things to hope for, the order of things to fear.

I live between those who live in the neighborhoods of poverty and vio­lence by the bay and those who can afford to live peaceably in the hills, near the center of town, at the edge of the business district, which, like a box that has been turned over, has been emptied of its activity at night. It is late and almost quiet. There is not much to do now and little reason to be out. None­theless, there is much to be heard:

Cars and trucks, released from rush hour communion, still con­tinuing their cautious daytime plodding, or racing from light to light with reck­less exuberance, their grinding pitch rising and falling with the shifting gears—

My neighbor in the apartment below, persisting in his diligent and flawed practice of Bach Inventions, those quick, twittering formulae of unattain­able perfection—

The couple in the apartment beside me, taking up once again their end­less marital quarrel in which he keeps time with his peremptory bass protests around which she flutters in a falsetto panic—

Some nights I hear only his voice and the time passes slowly with his deep, metrical anger. Others, only hers, and the night rushes by in dizzy­ing flight.

The pianist’s halting execution on the keyboard sounds more like some argument he holds with himself. For months they have been the only pieces he has played, as if he has decided he can go no further in his life until he has worked these out.

And the whirring, shifting gears of the cars and trucks echo the work­ings of some internal machinery, transmissions of laboring thought. The further away they are, the softer their sounds, sounds like the suspiration of distant, restless winds. . . .

It is a time of deliberation and agitation, a variable and imperfect time, a time not measured by the carefully reasoned time of Bach my neighbor tries but cannot grasp, a time different from the one that counts my hours at work, different from that counted by the clock which sits beside my bed, still differ­ent from that counted by the clock which ticks inside my head, as if time itself questions but cannot resolve the value of each pass­ing moment. Even the buses which stop outside my building do not follow their schedule, or do not seem to, and each arrival—fatal, with a scream of brakes, the shudder of opening doors—comes unexpected.

In the distance, a hard, insistent clatter, riveters working overtime, pounding away on a beam in the upper floors of a skyscraper whose height and need the city still debates, its whole steel skel­eton ringing dully with purpose—

A noise from above, somewhat resonant, thus somewhat celestial. Closer, from below, destructive noises:

Someone busting bottles on the courthouse steps—

A city crew out with jackhammers, tearing up a street, the blades sinking into the pliant asphalt with furious murmur, throwing off my heart with a fast and heavy, ominous beat—

Sounds somewhat menacing, somewhat infernal.

Bottles: a gang of kids, who come from the neighborhoods by the bay to wage their wars of juvenile aggression, who speak in a drumming, dis­sonant language I do not understand and am not meant to.

Other voices, isolated and sporadic, testing the night air with the tem­per of their hearts:

Drunks leaving a nearby bar in expansive moods, filling it with their beery egos—

Hookers camped out by our front door, slicing it with their cryptic chatter—

Somewhere, someone trying to shatter it with the cry of religion—

Somewhere else, someone else serenading it with a song of madness—

Everywhere, derelicts and mismatched lovers, cooing, venting, gar­bling the varying degrees of their abandon or discontent, confusing the expres­sion of love and despair—

Somewhat blissful voices of the somewhat saved, somewhat tor­mented voices of the somewhat damned.

But which is which?

Which is mine?

Closer, trees in the park across the street, swaying in an intermittent, hesitant breeze, their leaves sliding, brushing, a crepitant, electric sound, the sound of the itch of unfulfilled desire—

Yet closer, more kids, other kids, quiet kids—I do not know how they break in or whose they are—getting stoned in the well beneath my kitchen, whispering in furtive, susurrant tones—

Still closer, the nighthawks, coming out for no reason I can tell other than to stay perpetually awake, not speaking, leaving no trace other than the leather scratch of their shoes when they pass beneath my bed­room window—

So many random sounds—it is as if the city, too, has dropped its work­day mask and has been freed to the stirrings of its many selves, and I cannot think of its name apart from the shades and shadows of this noise. These sounds, however, do not keep me from sleep, rather, they feed my wakeful­ness of the hour. From their direction, from the way shouting or laughter is reflected off walls and reverberates in the empty space between, I can recon­struct the city in rough perspective, fixing the contours of buildings, laying out the gridwork of streets that stretches away from yet contains me. From their timbre, from what I can gather is said and done, I try to determine what yet eludes me, the content of this city where I have lived for many years.

And from the time that passes, I try to retrace the path my life has fol­lowed in the course the world has run. Each noise, each voice I hear touches some voice, some noise within. The gang’s shouting shakes loose the turbu­lence I thought I had buried with my youth, while the couple’s fights air my anger over some recent outrage I still try to contain. Lovers recall the loves I have had and lost, resurrecting the ache of spent passion, and other voices recall those who once were close, but have been left behind, or like derelicts, have fallen from my life.

My life, the world seem only to know the history of long­ing and regret.

Yet there are other possibilities:

To have loved once means I might love again, and those who once were close to me might still be close, in ways I cannot see. One recollection leads to another, populating the terrain of this vacant hour with the many voices of memory. I sense the threads of conti­nuities, connec­tions to be made, a structure of the world unfolding around me, and my life can feel full with these possibilities—

Two cars crash with sudden terror, not far off—

Something, someone thuds against the wall, next door—

But such geometry rests on difficult, slippery calculations. My love can reach across a plane of infinite extension, or feel like the tremor of a brief and inconsequential moment. Going back into my past leads me to the present, but when I look at my life now it already seems distant and lost. The more I focus on the voices of memory the more they sound like my own, but when I listen to my own voice it breaks into the words of many vague and separate persons.

And when I turn to check the clock, I feel I have been deceived: the time has vanished, or has not moved at all, and I start to doubt the next bus will ever come.

And listening to the random sounds outside my window only leads me to the scatter and fall of random things.

The pianist struggles with a lengthy trill, his left hand fumbling. . . .

.

.

Start over; listen:

More noises, other things scraping, grating, hissing—sounds of irrita­tion and unrest—

I don’t know what they are.

More voices, the homeless and displaced, plying the night with their tim­orous lament, as if they can only say in the dark what troubled them during the day—

In the park—

Named for the Welshman who seized the land in the name of our Republic from the Spanish don, granted it by his king to pay off the debts of war, who seized it from the natives who once led here, legend goes, a simple and contented pastoral life, the Welshman and his descendants waiting for the Chinese to come build the railroads, blacks from planta­tions in Texas and Louisiana to build the ports, the Republic to extend its grasp,

—the same transient, erupting in fits with his nightly diatribes against a varying and interchangeable group of oppressors, his screams now sus­tained by the shouts of the gang, who have left the courthouse steps to join him—

The same old woman—a bag lady? Who is she, whom does she recall?—heading for my building, taking the same path at the same time, follow­ing I don’t know what plan or schedule, muttering loudly and bitterly her complaint over what must be decades of a difficult life, railing against the mayor, her children, her hus­band, even her parents, who cannot still be alive—

So many random sounds—it is as if the apparent order of the visible world has lifted only to reveal this audible disorder, as if the notion of order itself is only a kind of illusion, the wish that flees from a troubled dream.

So many random sounds—there’s a sadness that can weigh heavily in this hour, as if the day can only conclude with a failure of reason, a loss of heart, the desperation of the vast, unredeemed space set by city walls.

Think:

Voices:

I cannot always make out the words, but the texture of their concern is easy enough to figure and can be explained by some inner compulsion or outer strain, linked to the way people feel they must act or cannot help acting towards themselves and each other, to all the things that can or cannot be done in a city:

1. The transient made a slip early in the chain of his reason­ing, or was abandoned and exposed to too much of the city too early in his life.

2. The old woman was rejected by her children when they grew up and took to the streets, and her husband died or left her as well, so she was forced from her home by rising rents and a shrinking income.

3. The kids come from poor and broken homes, have not been cared for, have not learned and have no use for restraint.

4. The man next door hates his job, his wife, himself, or all three, and one or both of them—it is diffi­cult to sort out their accusa­tions—have been unfaithful.

But I cannot always trust the surface of what I hear, and motives are hard to place. La Guardia is the old woman’s mayor and the transient’s oppressors sometimes come from Mars. The couple will fight over noth­ing, while the kids direct their scorn not against the fathers who have deserted them or the city fathers but rival gangs and passersby. And I really do not know where these kids come from, whether, in fact, they do not come from the hills instead and it is their parents’ order and wealth against which they rebel. Nor do I know if the old woman is poor or even if she ever had a family, and it may be the family she never had that most upsets her. There is only at best an uneven correlation between per­sonal distress and general disorder. It is diffi­cult to picture the world from the way it appears, to plot the dis­tance between lucid realities and the crystal­line look one might give them.

Yet the emotion in the voices is not always simple, nor the one I might expect. There’s a delight in the transient’s discontent and exuberance in the gang’s aggression. The couple’s fights have a purity and art that belie the vio­lence of their words, and even the old woman manages a lilt in her muttering.

And still, there are the other possibilities:

1. The transient may suddenly break out in an unrestrained and unin­tel­ligible rhapsody.

2. And the couple’s shouting fall to the low, muffled sounds of unconscious love.

3. The kids may turn on the transient and shower him with their impre­cations—

4. Or cheer him on with riotous jubilation.

And there’s a joy I know only at this hour that happens for no reason but falls like unsought grace, a joy that can only come from the play of random things. I can shed the constraints of the day that has passed, ignore the pull of the day to come. I could be anyone, anywhere, or don’t have to be anyone at all—

And if I fix my ears in a certain way, a kind of aural squint, noises take on the character of utterance, as if responding to some common urge, and voices lose their sense and take on another meaning, beyond inner strain, beyond the content of the words—

And a bus jolts and stammers as it stops outside my building, then groans with longing as it takes off with its charge, rattling my windows and shaking the floor as if by an earthquake, and up the street the last crowd leaves the theater, releas­ing a murmur confused and excited with whatever mood of thought or love or violence the movie has put them in, and two more drunks, caught in the momentum of some enor­mous joke, stumble down the sidewalk letting out laughter that rises to seraphic glee then falls to deep, ominous thunder, laughter some­what celestial, some­what infernal, and I hear more sounds of some­thing else being built or torn apart but cannot tell which, and the kids in the park turn on them­selves and break out in a fight, their fervid shouting mounting to a point of elation that transcends their hostility, as if they are moved by some supernal passion—

So many random sounds, yet they repeat themselves in patterns and variations on those patterns each night, so many different textures of sound counterpointing each other into one complex sound, so many different tempi of the different noises and voices orchestrated into one complex time, a time that might relent, or accelerate towards climax —

A kind of music, an atonal music that has no fixed key but still is music, a music that moves with time and matches my variable moods and seems closer to the world than the Bach I hear below, and it is only when my neighbor’s fingers stumble that his music sounds right—

More than music, a kind of desire, a driving passion that charges the walls of the heart and sets the edge to city streets, the desire which called me to this city—

And my wakefulness itself is a kind of desire, an itch to be close to the world. Each sound, soft and harsh, stirs this longing and quickens the desire, speaks with the same urgency, the same necessity to fit all the details of my affection into one blinding conclusion—

More than music, more than desire: since patterns and repetitions, signs of something larger, of an active, restless metaphysic which sets in motion the turbulence of things, juggling the order into which they fall and fly from and fall into again—

And I think: it is only through desperation and disorder that we know our hearts, only through our hearts that we can know our minds. Despair sets the ground from which hope can soar, disorder and destruction free from what has been the possibilities of what might yet be, and the space around me measures the breadth of these possibilities, the depth of my desire, the possi­bility that I might wake the next morning a new man in a new world—

At last discover the light of the divine—

Or failing this, create it—

.

.

—or signs of nothing more than large and meaningless confluence.

.

.

With a shattering of fragile thought and feeling, the world comes crash­ing down. But when I get up, go to the window, and raise the shades, I see that the buildings are still intact. Beneath them, in the park, the kids stand mutely around a fallen warrior. . . .

.

.

Start over: listen, think again:

I live between those who live in the neighborhoods of poverty and vio­lence by the bay and those who can afford to live peaceably in the hills, near the business district, the center of town. But I have no place here. The city in which we all live belongs to none of us, and the gangs who roam the streets can claim only a spirit of derision that keeps the rest of us inside.

There is a difference between the desire for order and the order of desire.

One night, in the park, another old woman—who was she, whom does she recall?—was beaten and stabbed, and left to bleed lifeless into the next morning.

One morning the mutilated body of a prostitute was found on the court­house steps.

Another night a black gang from the projects by the bay, caught in the middle of a robbery of an electronics store, took hostages and shot them one by one, throwing them out, until the SWAT team descended.

It was several months, though, before the police found the gang of middle-class white kids who had been bombing Asian stores.

And it was in the park that daytime order was disrupted by the mer­chants of nighttime desire, drug lords fighting over territory, who shot at each other across the open field while kindergarten kids wandered through the cross fire, erect and dazed, except for the Vietnamese and Cambodians, who were prepared and knew what to do, hitting the ground at the first shot.

Drugs, at least, have given the city a purpose, or at least a face that it recognizes. Funds have been freed, morals clarified, forces mobilized. Cries have come from everywhere for a crackdown on crime, a return to order—

But I do not know if the order that controls daytime commerce is dif­fer­ent from that which traffics nighttime desire.

The desire for order might know no order but the order of desire.

For weeks the rumblings could be heard, as if of a distant war, as tene­ments were razed to build a throughway to the interstate by the bay. Neigh­borhoods were gutted, and I know that if I hear more voices at night it is because the residents who were evicted were not given someplace else to live. And if I hear a chorus of madness now, it is because the state cleared out its psych wards many years ago and dumped the patients on the streets.

The city seems only to know the need to build, which is not the same as the need for space and order. Though the streets are crowded, offices go unlet, and yet the banks continue to pour money into high-rises. The time, they say, is ripe for speculation.

And the city knows no time, has only the means to efface it, to build glass boxes that mirror each other in silvery distortion. When we look at them from the street as we walk by, we only see ourselves, looking. There is no plan other than that determined by what people can or cannot afford; between these possibilities lies the center, the business district, a place to negotiate this disparity.

Between these possibilities lie violence and the desire for order.

I do not know if a city can have a heart and mind.

I do know, however, that one should be cautious about the outward look given to inner turmoil. And I know about the many disorders of desire. There exists a vast and interrelated universe of causes and symp­toms, a catalog of precise names for specific afflictions—

But to study these would reduce the world to the order of disease, which I assume is not the order of the world.

If it were, how could we ever hope to effect a cure?

And to say the world is sick implies some standard by which this judg­ment can be made, but I do not know what this standard might be: sanity’s catalog is not so well reasoned.

The desire for order might not be the order of desire.

Nor do I know that if I identified and cured the afflictions the world would be a better place, or even different.

Because it is a violent world, which cannot be contained by an idea.

Or if it could, I cannot think what violence would be needed to contain it. . . .

.

.

Just as quickly, just as easily, the world falls to mere randomness. . . .

.

.

and silence. . . .

.

.

Few test the streets now, leaving them to whatever we fear or imagine there is to be feared, which may or may not manifest itself in a scream in the dead of night, or more shouting, or the peal of an alarm from another store that has been broken into.

Or the cry of a siren, the slow pulse of light from a squad car that has just stopped outside my window.

To think and reflect at this hour is like holding a mirror up to myself in the dark, to a dark glass where, without the assurance of the visible world, the images I most clearly see may be the ones I project. And it is at night that I realize that there is much that is unsettled in my life, much that I have forgot­ten or hidden. If I were attentive, I might find the clues that would indicate the symptoms of some problem I have refused to deal with. But when I con­sider the many bits and pieces and try to follow their suggestions, I see that they lead to one problem as well as another, and it is only by deciding that I have a problem that I can put this order in my life.

What seemed hard and fast during the day is no longer so certain. The many doubts and disturbances I could dismiss in its light as petty and out of place now claim ascendance over my thoughts. The reason that guides my work, any of the work that has tried to reason the heart and mind all seem built on careful, exact—useless distinctions, elaborate constructions easily toppled, as if all thought has never been nor ever will be more than an endless stutter.

It must be my job that has brought me to this state, but then there was a time when I believed my work would settle my life’s uncertainties.

When I think about it at night, I see that I have always felt this way.

And when the last bus leaves, stopping only a second because no one is waiting, and my floor and windows settle after it leaves, when my neighbor below plays his last note, and the kids who get stoned beneath my kitchen announce they are finished by knocking over a trash can, when all is quiet and still, I know only that I am lost. I have to remind myself who and where I am.

But it doesn’t matter what name I give to myself or what name the city has. I could be anyone, anywhere, but I cannot think of the name that might resolve this confusion. Reason turns to barest vigilance, an inward listening. All I am aware of is the quiet, sometimes troubled voic­ing of my uncertain existence. I feel unformed and uncreated, ever stuck in a proc­ess of becoming from which there is no issue.

This moment of uncertainty, though, does not last long. I know I will eventually fall asleep, that I will wake tomorrow morning and that day will fol­low in some approximation of the one now ending. Whatever has hap­pened in the streets tonight may or may not turn up in the paper. The couple on next door will leave without making a noise, or I might run into them on the land­ing and see their quiet, sober faces, see that they are more rested than I. The pianist, too, will be silent, because he has not yet found work and is sleeping in. The kids who got stoned will have left some inde­cipherable rune spray­painted on the wall. The transient will be asleep inside the park’s foun­tain, which the city turned off years ago because another one drowned in it.

And I will wake up and go to work.

But during this moment, it seems it will never end, as if all time has led only to this time, beyond which there is no other. I can hear now only the hum of so many nerves transmitting their messages of hope and despair in one monotonous drone, as if my life has no other significance than this tedi­ous buzzing that resounds indefinitely in the indefinite, infinite, wan­ton space of the world. . . .

.

.

. . . when I do fall asleep and dream, I dream of nothing, have dreams that move like large empty boxes, sliding, scraping, crashing in a large empty room. . . .

.

.

.

The Russian Student

.

Winter 2001

They would have seen the images, even though most were only ten or so at the time and some weren’t even here, the black and white footage of the white men circling around a single black, the black man rising, falling, the arms of the circle rising, falling, the black man trying to rise once more. The images were repeated a year later, the same footage slowed down and dissected frame by frame, this footage soon followed by that of fire and smoke rising in that city for several days—at the time we were shown nothing but—and of a white man being pulled from the cab of his truck, and falling, and some in the room even know his name.

And these images have persisted, with them, with all of us, in spite of all the images, fabricated and real, that have since been pushed our way to grab all of our attention, and it doesn’t seem they will ever go away.

Does anyone know what the images represent, why all the disturbance happened and what it meant?

He was in his thirties when he saw the footage, yet when he replays the frames now, in his mind, he cannot see any faces. The motion of the kicks and the raised and lowered arms appears methodical and lifeless, the circling senseless, as if he is watching a ritual that has drifted from its context, from any kind of ceremony or belief.

But his purpose today is direct, and, he thought, fairly clear. The English instructor is having his class discuss an essay on the LA riots and first wants to make sure they know the background.

Our history of black/white injustice, civil rights, civil strife, police brutality, and, of course, a violent society—they rattle off the answers as if for a fill-in-the-blank test, as they may have been asked to do in high school, though from the pat way they reply it sounds as if they are talking about something distant, something that happened to someone else, buried in the past, not relevant anymore, or at any rate not relevant to them.

“If the causes are so obvious,” the English instructor asks, “why didn’t anyone see the riots coming, at least to this extent? Some fifty dead, a billion in damage, our second largest city brought to its knees.”

The class looks at him with blank faces.

“No one saw Watts coming, either.”

Which he has to explain.

No blacks in the class, however, and not many in the school, which may account for their remove. It is hard to accept what has not been seen, what none of us see that often, what in effect has been hidden. Also history for them is anything that happened a few years ago. The time it takes for the recent to become displaced has gotten shorter, which may not wholly be their fault.

But mention of money and death stirs discussion, and as they review the specifics—innocent victims, the property loss, wholesale looting—the class divides, their voices heat. Concrete details touch the quick of their own views of responsibility, of authority, even of oppression, though these are personal and in some cases juvenile and forced.

They got what they deserved, one student claims, though doesn’t say who they were or why, which sets off a mixed roar of approval and outrage. A few try to temper his remarks with explanations of the hardships in poor neighborhoods, of psychological strain, though these are sketchy and unconvincing. But there is some social concern in the class after all. He wouldn’t have heard such comments in the private schools where he has taught. Monte Vista is a community college, whose doors are open, its fees inexpensive.

Others, however, sit and stew in indignation as they listen.

Bullshit, another student shouts, and several nod assent. He doesn’t explain, however, perhaps because he doesn’t think he needs to. More likely he hasn’t often been asked to explain himself before. The English instructor can guess, however, that their philosophy goes like this: one takes what one gets in life, does the best he or she can, and doesn’t complain—a message they get at home, and elsewhere.

He wonders what the Russian student thinks, given what he may have seen when he was younger. But he sits in the back corner with his boots propped up on an empty desk in front, stares straight at him, or maybe through him, and says nothing. He looks like he is listening, perhaps is engaged, but there are also twists on his face that suggest a sneer of defiance. Against what, the instructor has no idea. He hasn’t said anything since the quarter started.

“What works for the individual may not work for society as a whole,” the English instructor says.

Because one of his goals is to get his students to think globally, beyond the immediate circles of their lives.

“Understanding causes, the reasons why strife happens, is not the same thing as justifying it.”

A distinction he has made many times before, not always with success.

He does get frustrated with his students for their incomplete thought, their knee-jerk reactions. Still, they are young and are learning, and he knows he should be patient. His students, for their part, often suspect when he teaches such material that he is pulling an agenda. It is a temptation he has to watch. His major goal is to get them to look at what they are saying and think it through, to learn to think for themselves. He should not take sides, but help them learn to let reason speak for itself so it can speak through them.

To do this he should encourage them to speak up, then see what can be managed out of what comes. First he must earn their respect himself, and to do this he should be impartial but committed to what he is doing, or at least put on this face, not tell them what to think.

But he also believes he should respect them because he knows they are decent at heart, that many are of better character than he. The English instructor does not hold illusions about what his discipline brings.

“Before we reach judgment, we should first understand.”

Besides, he’s not convinced the way they think is that different from the way many others do, who are older. He often has to remind himself of the advice he has just given.

“Otherwise me may tag the wrong people and our sentences will have no effect.”

They look at him once more. But his reassuring voice calms them and brings them back together, ready to follow. Perhaps, too, the implications of what he has just said sinks in.

“Everyone was hurt by the riots, one way or another. Sometimes events go to such extremes that it doesn’t matter what we think. We have to put our judgments aside, pick up the pieces as best we can, and figure out what to do.”

Also lately he has been wondering what he is supposed to tell them, were he of a mind.

So much has changed in the world, and in so many ways the world, with its strains, its conflicts, its failures, its realignments and dislocations, has come to him. Before him every day, a spectrum of Asians from half the globe, from a wide range of political and cultural systems, still shifting. Indians and Pakistanis, who in the classroom peacefully coexist. Eastern Europeans, who have seen the names of their nations replaced, their borders redrawn. More recently, a sprinkling from the Middle East. The sons and daughters of the Central American migrations, many of whose families have been here some time, now at the school because it reached out to them.

Not all of them are refugees; many have come for the raw opportunities. After all, this is Silicon Valley, where people think nothing of making millions. While it’s not likely they will get rich, they should be rewarded for their abilities and their efforts, or at least they hold out this hope.

And, of course, there are whites, some from other states for whom California is a foreign place. Their specific heritage, however, is so mixed or their ties to it so diluted that the label white doesn’t denote an ethnicity but rather is a transparent container. There isn’t a majority of any group in the class, and getting along for them is not an ideal but a fact of life.

The English instructor himself is white, though his whiteness doesn’t hold much for him other than its former privilege, and while he grew up in a middle-class home, his income puts him down in blue collar, a term which now refers to those who have to fight to keep their heads above water. He is a part-time instructor, and has been so for over sixteen years, fourteen of them at Monte Vista, who has to stitch together assignments at several schools. Tonight he will drive thirty miles up to Hayward State for a class that runs to ten. Tomorrow he will head almost as far south to another school. But he hasn’t given up hope himself that something will turn up, his career settle, his status rise a notch.

Many of the changes, however, he has seen in class for some time. Now he’s getting more names on his roster he does not know how to pronounce and the nations represented are not familiar. Ethnicities have intermarried, producing new mixes. Many others have families that go back a generation or more and their ties have slackened. And all of his students seem to be moving towards adopting a common identity of this place which he supposes is American, though it is so diffuse he isn’t sure what it is, if there is one. Identity has become not a defining point but an open question.

There have been other changes that make the English instructor wonder where he stands. A loose yet driving pop culture that takes its metaphors from crime and repeats itself, as if in a percussive stutter; a consumer culture that loves us more than ever, no matter what we think. Laws that once ruled our economy have been deemed invalid or put aside, the value of its products and of those of us who make them set on end. Higher up in our culture, where he supposedly belongs, there are endless camps making endless distinctions, where nothing is left unscathed and everything has been thrown up for grabs.

So he has to do for himself what he is trying to get his students do today, get back on track and focus on the purpose. The purpose today is to get them to summarize an essay. To do that they need to grasp its purpose and see how all its parts fit. Summary is an important skill: their ability to analyze a writer’s ideas gives them the power of understanding, which will help them read other texts and guide them when they write their own.

The essay they are looking at today is Jack Miles’s “Blacks vs. Browns,” whose main purpose is to trace causes for the LA riots. It comes from the anthology California Dreams and Realities. He selected the book because it was getting harder to find material that might engage all his students. Other anthologies, built around current events that were supposed to interest students their age, didn’t. California, however, and coming to terms with it, is something they all have in common. Its dreams are attractive, its realities are what they will have to face when they get out of school, if they haven’t done so already.

For their first paper, he had them summarize John Cassidy’s “The Comeback,” an essay that analyzes the various factors that led to the state’s phenomenal rebound after the slump of the early ’90s, a time when many Californians were cashing in on their homes and pulling out. The instructor likes the text because it is complex, reviewing many factors and their interrelationship. Little, he believes, is ever simple, another message he passes on to his students. Cassidy also credits California for its imagination, its openness to new ideas, and this the instructor also believes, that we need to find a way to make room for intangibles.

One major factor for the comeback, of course, was Silicon Valley itself. The essay not only gives the numbers but also reveals a world that was hidden from him and his students, what went on inside those small faceless buildings with cryptic names, the enclosed campuses, the glass corporate structures, and without, an invisible network, electronic and word-of-mouth, where trends, techniques, and opportunities were passed around, which helped sustain the industry and fed the spirit.

And there was a spirit then, an uplifting, an opening up of possibilities, that everyone felt not long ago at all, even those who weren’t in the industry, even the instructor and his students. When he taught “The Comeback” last winter, they liked it because it was upbeat and touched what they call the real world, which for them is the world of work and business, in which they invest their faith. They did well on their papers.

Another factor, not out of sight but overlooked, yet a large part of the overall picture, was the burgeoning of small businesses throughout the state, many started by those who came here from abroad to make a go of it. Small things, added up, can make a difference. They also help explain the makeup of his class, and his students’ mood of a year ago.

Now the Nasdaq has been on a slide for the last nine months, taking the Dow Jones with it. Trillions in investments have vanished in thin air. The English instructor does not know how he can bring such a number down to earth for his students—it is a another problem he has had with much else they have looked at, that the numbers involved exceed common comprehension. Nor does he know what awaits them when they get out of school, but the signs are not good. Forecasters debate when the market will bottom out. Meanwhile, business is off everywhere, he hears, and restaurants and shops and other small concerns throughout the Valley have shut down. The network remains invisible and he still does not hear what it passes, but as best he can tell the industry is consolidating into large firms, and cutting back and retrenching, loading up to do once again what it did before. The enclosed corporate campuses, he suspects, are now closed off. Programmers are turning up in his classes, looking to start a new career.

Though business is down, real estate has only leveled off. Almost none in the class live in Monte Vista, including the instructor, because none can afford it. Though the homes are modest, they are still going for $700k and up. Some just buy them for their lots, raze the houses, and put up stucco palaces. It amazes him anyone has that kind of money. Life, however, is not that much cheaper farther out.

The school itself has been immune to all the ups and downs only because it has been struggling all along, an island desert surrounded by a sea of money. Prop 13 and tax wars in Sacramento have been taking their toll for some time, and in the fourteen years he has been there, the college has undergone a series of budget crises and hiring freezes, hard times and flush, one reason he is still a part-timer, along with fifty others in his department. Its many buildings, flat and spread out, whose form barely follows function, are in various states of disrepair; the physical plant sputters. Support services keep getting cut, or are perpetually temporarily funded. He wonders how Monte Vista might compare with a similar school in the Soviet Union, or now in Russia.

But enrollment is up, the campus active with a roil of students day and night. Hard times bring people back to school. The ride down has been exhilarating and put everyone on his or her toes.

His students this quarter still liked the Cassidy essay, again because it was upbeat, and they have not lost their faith in the real world, in spite of all the signs. They have been upbeat themselves, and again did well on their papers. But the English instructor wonders how long their mood will hold.

He understands, however, they are not being wholly sentimental about the world outside the classroom because it is the only one that will give them a paycheck. He also realizes this, that if they are going to make it there, they will have to take what they get, do the best they can, and not complain.

But to land almost any kind of job, they first must get a degree. If they want to transfer to one of the state’s universities, they will need a decent GPA because competition there is stiff and those schools have been tackling financial concerns of their own. Before his students can get a degree, they must jump over the many hurdles of requirements, which have grown like everything else the past years in what seems a general trend of complication.

Not least of which, they have to take several composition courses. English is not a favorite with his students. For most writing is hard, and not just non-native speakers. Nor are they convinced they will need what he teaches when they graduate. The English instructor sometimes wonders if they are not right, in spite of all the talk.

Yet while he sympathizes with them, he still believes in what he does.

Besides, what are his other options?

And he likes his students and where he teaches. They are the ones who most need the power of mind his instruction can give them, which, if not in work, might yet pay off somewhere else.

The English instructor is not unsentimental himself.

So he bolsters the impartial face and gets back to the purpose. The first step in summary is to look closely at the text and see exactly what is there, which is what he asks them to do.

The details they find, however, disturb them, and the discussion heats up once more. Illegal aliens attending crowded schools, getting driver’s licenses or riding around without; blacks and Latinos competing for welfare and social services—these do not sit well with any of his students, nor can they see them in any context.

What about the Korean stores? another asks. They got looted and burned, too. Someone mentions Latasha Harlins, who isn’t in the text, the black girl who, a year before the riots, got shot and killed by a Korean worker in a liquor store. Others counter with gang threats to the store, general crime among blacks in South Central.

Silence from the Asians, but behind which the instructor suspects there is much thought, tempered by greater discipline and reserve.

Someone else mentions Latino distrust of Asian employers, the possibility of exploitation, which are in the text. Also in the text and also raised in class is an editorial in a Mexican American newspaper that sees blacks as perpetrators, not victims. Latinos had their stores looted as well, and suffered other violence.

What ostensibly was an issue black and white has spilled over into other colors. Instead of finding causes his students look for groups to blame. In this, the instructor knows, they are not alone either. And as has happens elsewhere, the discussion gets tied up into a knot of innocence and guilt where it is difficult to find either.

Where they stand together is in their outrage against preferential hiring, Angelenos giving domestic work and other unskilled jobs to Latinos over blacks because they trust them more. It violates the students’ sense of fairness, universal, as well as disrupts the adjustments they have made growing up together, and perhaps touches some dormant nerves, perhaps reinforces some suspicions. The author did it himself, they point out, which makes them distrust the text, what Miles is trying to do.

But they have only strayed farther from his purpose.

The English instructor looks back at the Russian student, hoping he might yet speak up.

Several things make the Russian student stand out and have stirred the instructor’s interest. He is tall, and older than the other students, though he is not sure how much. His boots, jeans, and denim jacket, which he wears every day, do not quite fit the standard of casual dress, nor look like they were bought in the U.S.

He is fairly certain he is Russian—he has a Russian name, Sergei. What strikes the instructor most is that, while he has seen Russian Jews freed during glasnost, who fit in, did well, and moved on, as well as recent immigrants from the outer countries when the Soviet Union split up, Sergei seems wholly Russian, his first. In fact he looks like a Russian soldier in some Cold War movie, tall, strong, committed, and only slightly Slavic, who has transcended his ethnic heritage in the service of a higher cause.

This is the main attraction and the reason he hopes he speaks, that he represents a part of the instructor’s past. The instructor is old enough to have Cold War memories, and while he took pride in American conquests in sports arenas and is aware of Soviet abuse—required reading while he was in school—he also, like many others, stood in awe of Soviet achievements. It was the Russians, after all, who got us wondering if we were as smart as we needed to be. And, like some, he had sympathy for a country that at least tried to build a society on social ideals, even if they didn’t work out. The Russian student should be old enough to have studied problems with our system. While the world has gone our way, not without cause, the instructor does not believe capitalism has moved passed criticism, or that capitalism and democracy are synonymous or even necessarily compatible, or that our country wouldn’t benefit from a few more ideas.

The Russian student, however, says nothing and still stares back, but the twists in his face have torqued another notch.

Also he didn’t turn in the first paper.

Miles indeed tells the story of a Latino youth he calls Rodriquez, whom he hired to make repairs on his home then later took under his wing, helping him with school and legal matters. When he graduated Rodriquez found work in construction, but then turned to drugs and crime, and, at the time of the essay, was in jail. This most upsets the students, raising the pitch of their outrage and distrust. They were taught to follow laws and not ask for handouts. They have adopted the mold of the good citizen, no matter how well it fits, and don’t know what to make of someone who broke it.

Stories have a point, or should, the instructor reminds them, and they have completely missed the point of this one. Rodriguez provides an example of a Latino who could not be trusted.

The Latino students fall silent now, perhaps because their group has been singled out. Silent maybe from shame, or maybe because they do have something to say but don’t know how to say it either, or maybe still are not convinced they have the freedom to do so.

“You’ve left out a key detail. Over half those arrested during the riots were Latino. The verdict didn’t fall against them.”

The instructor waits for his students to put the pieces together. The answer to him is utterly obvious, in fact stares them in the face throughout the essay, yet nothing comes.

He scans the class to look at what his teaching today has created, a class divided, tense, confused, and angry, and possibly in a few cases even hurt. He has taught the essay several times before, but not with this result. In another place, with other people, the results might have been more severe.

Still he waits, but the silence and tension only build. He tries to think of some way to pull them out, but despairs anything he says now will have any effect.

 “Peanuts,” the Russian student says at last, picking up a note from the text.

“Please explain,” the instructor asks, relieved.

“Everyone fighting for peanuts.”

“There’s plenty of money in Los Angeles.”

“Not for them.”

The instructor waits for the continuation of his argument, but the Russian student stops. So he takes over himself and tries to bring in the rest of the class. There are times when the instructor feels he should not let the thread slip away. The Russian student shows no objection.

“What happens when a lot of workers compete for a few jobs?”

Wages go down—supply and demand they understand.

“How far?”

They make their best guess.

“Look at the text. When you come here with nothing, you’ll take anything you can get and be happy to have it. But how long can that last?”

He places himself dispassionately before the words on the page, not because he doesn’t care about them, but precisely because he does.

Rodriguez, the text tells them, was fluent in two languages, had a high school degree, and was a skilled worker. Yet he was only getting four or five bucks an hour putting up drywall in condos that probably sold for a million, without much chance of making more. His sisters worked in a sweatshop.

“How far does five bucks an hour go in LA?”

They know the answer.

Then he asks them to imagine what Rodriguez saw around him, the expensive flash—the cars, the homes, the clothes—then calculate his distance from those.

“Multiply Rodriguez’s case by thousands, tens of thousands. What happens?”

He doesn’t wait for their reply but goes straight to the point so it will not escape.

“If Rodriguez had been on the streets of South Central that night, he might have been looting with the others. Miles isn’t defending his behavior, but at some point we have to factor in human nature.”

Then there are things they will not know, so it’s his job to fill in.

 “We’ve seen this one played out with almost every group who’s come here.”

Look, he says, at the Irish in the 1860s, poor, excluded, and crowded in the slums of New York, then told to serve in war.

“Their riot turned the city upside down.”

 Now putting himself before the text of history itself.

 “As for blacks, Miles explains.”

When the Industrial Revolution geared up, they could have been offered jobs in the factories and moved up from there. Instead America called to Europe. Then they finally get a toehold in Los Angeles, only to see it slip away once more.

“Over a hundred years of falling down will spoil anyone’s spirit.”

And he has backed off so effectively that he is near the point of indifference.

“Besides, this is supposed to be the land opportunity. It is the value that defines us. We have to consider what it means when our practice and our values do not meet.”

Which does strike a chord with the class, and the instructor allows a pause. He is moved himself, not because of opportunity, which to him seems mechanical and limited, but because of what might lie behind it, what that might mean. But he backs away from this feeling as well, because he has one more task for them to do.

The class has been with him all the way, following, understanding, and while he has not resolved their differences, he has brought them together and earned their trust.

The Russian student has nodded here and there and hasn’t taken his eyes off him. But the twists in his face have tightened into a mask of incredulity, or maybe indignation, or maybe something else. It is a face that is hard to look at, even harder to read.

He can’t reach everyone. The English instructor perseveres.

“If we don’t understand why the riots happened back then, there’s a chance something similar could happen again, elsewhere with different people, even here, now, with us.”

They are skeptical.

“At any rate, we need to learn to look beyond the specifics of a situation and focus on what is essential.”

Which brings him to his major goal today, one of several around which he has designed the course and that he presents to them as politically neutral. Later in the quarter he will ask them to check evidence and dispute assumptions. But that will take outside research. Today he wants them to go beyond summarizing a text and explore its implications, using what is presented in the essay and what they can figure out themselves.

“The way we define causes will determine the quality of our solutions.”

If Miles is right in his analysis of causes, and he emphasizes the if, how might they solve the problems he raises? More is at stake than preventing another riot. They have in the text and inside their heads and hearts, he tells them, everything they need.

He breaks them into small groups for discussion, after which each will be asked to give its answers to the class. Chairs scrape, circles form, they set themselves to the task, not without expectation.

It is a difficult exercise, he knows, with no clear solutions, but it gives them a chance to define priorities and work out the best possible compromises. Also it puts them in a position of authority, giving them the power to make large decisions. And it might encourage them to consider who they are, who we are, what we all care about, or should, what defines us as a whole. At the very least, it should get them thinking.

The instructor knows he is not being completely neutral. After all, he is the one who selected the text. He does not believe politics is everything, as some in his field do, whose writing tends to be particular, exclusive, and, quite frankly, hard to follow. But politics is part of our lives, and certainly a large part of life in California, the general theme for the course. Its effects can be hugely consequential, thus are worth looking at, especially in a country that elects politicians who do not believe we need government.

He also knows some debate impartiality, who even claim reason itself is a mask for base motives. The English instructor understands the arguments and cannot refute them, but does not know where they leave him. Writers have been trying to bring society together for centuries, and they have must have been referring to something outside themselves. There are physical facts, there are forces, there are common desires. Surely something can be assembled from these.

If not, what are the other options here?

Talk in the groups falls off quickly, however. He waits for a second wind, which does not come. So he brings the class back together to give their reports, hoping more discussion might grow from these.

Their solutions, however, are quick and lead nowhere. Leave, don’t come here, a few joke. Immigration restriction some offer with urgency, which brings protest from others, neither side fitting within clear ethnic lines. Raise the minimum wage, another suggests. It would stall the economy, the business majors counter. They are thinking about present times, which is what the instructor wants, but they can’t come up with a larger scheme that might become a plan of action. For most the problem is hopeless.

He looks at the Russian student to see if he has an answer, but Sergei still stares back. His expression has not changed.

The instructor has several answers in mind, which to him are readily apparent, even simple. He doesn’t wish to lecture them, though, which would accomplish nothing, but rather wants to leave them thinking. Something will come out of the effort, if not with this text, then with others later in the quarter. Besides, the class is almost over and it would take him some time to explain.

Also he is discouraged.

But that afternoon he begins to doubt his answers are that simple, or even if they’d work. It also occurs to him that if his students struggled with the text, it may not have been because they didn’t see what was in it, but because they saw it too well. What surfaces from beneath these doubts is the expression on the Russian student’s face, which now approaches something that looks like hate. If so, he wonders what lies behind that.

But these thoughts are interrupted when he backs out of the parking lot and hears a loud clicking on the pavement, then feels he is leaning. When he gets out, he sees his right rear tire is nearly flat. In it, a large machine screw, flush to the head. For the first time since he bought the car, he has to change the tire, the spare an undersized wheel whose design he has always questioned.

It takes a while to find a gas station that makes repairs. When he finds one, the mechanic tells him the hole is too large to plug. He’d have to replace both back tires, but is not going to pay their prices, yet doesn’t have time to search for a discount store and have new tires put on before it closes. So he keeps the spare and leaves early for his class in Hayward to avoid rush hour traffic. The yellow label on the spare warned him not to exceed 50 mph, so he drives 45 to be safe. It didn’t tell him, though, how long he could use it. Thirty miles up and back—he might be pushing it.

The San Mateo Bridge is crowded, however, yet the cars still speed past the limit and honk behind him in blaring anger. Slow down, he thinks, and the world presses down on you. From the bridge he has a view of what he has long since stopped looking at in his own push to keep up with the traffic, with his schedule, but sees now because of his speed, an open, empty sky. Beneath it, the spread of suburban growth from Oakland over to Fremont and beyond, more dense and farther up into the hills than he remembers, which, like the traffic rushing towards it, seems urgent, menacing, and pointless, a suspicion that does not go away as he returns late that night, when there is little traffic.

This hour is one of few he has to himself, a time he usually spends in quiet reflection, thinking back on his day, often with satisfaction, as well as looking forward. Driving back across the bridge, however, he worries about the spare and its limits. He still feels like he is leaning on the road. The suspicion gradually is replaced by another that begins to materialize when he drives into his neighborhood in Santa Clara, packed itself with modest houses, like those in Monte Vista, but less kept up, where the people are more vocal and sure of themselves, at least at home, and with townhouse and condo complexes, at one of which he lives, where his wife and daughter will be asleep because both have to get up early, his wife a biology teacher at a nearby high school, his daughter a fifth grader at a primary school also close, the suspicion becoming more distinct as he drives past the park with the skateboard pits where he makes his turn, where teenagers are still out, some attacking the slopes in loud scratches, others standing in a group beneath a light, smoking, talking about what he can imagine, or maybe not.

“I think the Russian did it,” he tells his wife.

“Why?”

 “Why I think he would put a screw in my tire or why I think he is the one who did it?”

“Both.”

But she turns and goes back to sleep before he can answer. He has a full day ahead himself, yet lies awake, pondering answers to this question and others raised today.

.

The Russian student stands before him at ease, but the way a soldier might without letting down his guard, or if not a soldier someone used to similar work. He’s smiling, a slight upward turn, but the instructor sees it is not a smile he wears but a flexible part of his stance, coolly set to shift into a next move.

Sergei is much taller than the instructor thought, six feet six or more. And stronger. And older, mid-twenties, maybe even early thirties. His hair, short and parted, is a light off brown that might be turning, and there are faint creases in his face, though these may have come from experience, not age.

The instructor is tall himself, and this is one of a few times in his career he has physically looked up to a student. He realizes now he has other reasons to approach his inquiry with tact.

For the second paper he asked his students to redefine the California Dream. There are many different versions of the Dream, discussed in several essays in the anthology, and he encouraged them to select ideas from these, as well as add their own. Dreams, he told them, may not come true but still they guide decisions, and the California Dream has helped determine the kind of state we have. For many it is the reason they have come here. Think about your audience, he asked them, and what writing can accomplish. If they were not happy with where the state was headed, their essays, if convincing, if read by enough people, might change minds and alter its course.

His only condition was that they think their ideas through and try to come up with workable solutions. Some dreams don’t stand up to inspection. And even good dreams, if incomplete or poorly defined, can lead a state astray. He asked them to consider the paradoxes James Rawls raises in his essay “California: A Place, A People, A Dream.” The more of us who come here for its wealth and its resources, the sooner these run out; who come for its environment, the more we spoil it; for its freedom, the greater chance we cut loose from each other, from ourselves.

The papers weren’t very good. Most chose opportunity but just listed industries in the state. Some touched on diversity, nature, and community, but fumbled with these and didn’t have much to say. The papers that attempted freedom were horribly scattered. What he most wanted to see was what the papers most lacked, conviction and some kind of spirit. Rawls gives them something to think about here as well, because, like Cassidy, he praises California for its inventiveness, in fact argues that its paradoxes and dreams form part of an ongoing dialectic from which the state recreates itself and moves on.

The Russian student might know something about dialectics. He didn’t turn this paper in, either, however, and the instructor decided it was time for a talk. So he asked him to meet after class, outside, by a fountain the school turned off years ago.

Of course he doesn’t plan to mention the tire. He has no hard evidence and doesn’t know what pursuing it would accomplish. There is much he has to put aside in the service of his profession. For a similar reason he decides the missing work is a matter best approached slowly.

Does the Russian student mind his asking where he is from?

“Petersburg.”

The instructor understands Saint Petersburg is a beautiful city, though doesn’t know why he says that. He’s never even seen pictures.

“Is copy. Built on swamp.”

The instructor understands many famous writers lived there.

The Russian student does not seem interested in literature.

Perhaps the instructor’s curiosity gets the best of him, because he asks him about changes in Russia he might have witnessed the last ten years.

“Gangs.”

The instructor did not mean youth in the country. What he is curious about is the economy and quality of life since the change. What he doesn’t ask for, but wants to hear, is criticism of consumerism, to which, he’s heard, Russia has given its soul.

“Gangs.”

The government then. Don’t people vote?

“Gangs.”

The Russian student does smile now, as if he’s told a joke. The instructor senses he’s being ridiculed and decides it’s time to get to the business at hand.

About the papers.

“What about papers?”

The instructor informs him he is not in the habit of flunking students. It will be hard, however, to give him any kind of grade at all without seeing his work. He will take the papers any time.

The Russian student does not reply.

He will at least need credit for the course when he transfers and works for a degree.

“I have degree.”

He will need English for a job if he stays here.

He looks off sharply.

Or is he planning to return to Russia?

He sharply looks off elsewhere.

May the instructor know why he is here?

“Looking around.”

Are there no articles in the Russian language?

His head jerks back and he stares, his face a bolt of anger, giving the instructor a start.

Then he relaxes, then he smiles, or doesn’t.

Then he leaves.

It takes a moment for the instructor to regain his composure. But he has been in similar situations before—it is a very public school—and this talk, too, he begins to put aside.

Later, however, it occurs to him Sergei was lying about the degree, or if he had one he didn’t get it at any institution, a suspicion that grows when, walking to his car, he sees him talking intently to two other students, younger, much shorter, both with buzz cuts, and who appear Slavic, maybe are Russian as well. All three stare at him as he passes.

The suspicion seems confirmed and at the same time radiates out in all directions when he gets to his car and sees that someone has taken a heavy object to his windshield and to the ones of the cars on either side, radiates out in a crazed, widening pattern, like the cracks that spread from the point of impact at the driver’s head.

A security officer comes out, but tells him there isn’t much they can do without a witness. The instructor cancels his class at Hayward so he can find an auto glass repair shop. In the meantime the windshield will have to be something else he puts aside. Vandalism, though not common, still occurs, and while the school is a busy place, much goes unreported.

That night, when everyone is asleep, he stays up wondering what the Russian student might do next. He also wonders why he really wanted to talk to him.

When he sleeps, his dreams shatter, and several times he wakes.

.

One morning, before class, the instructor reads in the school paper that the trial has begun for the Monte Vista student who last winter, lunchtime, showed up in the cafeteria with two backpacks filled with pipe bombs. The bombs spilled out of one and he was stopped. There was much debate as to whether or not he would have carried out his mission otherwise. His motives were incoherent. The only details that surfaced were that both his parents worked long hours and no one knew anything about him.

The instructor talked about the incident with his students last year, in case they might have been upset, yet they didn’t seem to be, or didn’t show it, but reacted as if his behavior was just one of those things, belonging to the order of things that can happen and that they did not question. Still, nothing of this magnitude had ever occurred at the school, or in the city, or, as far as he knew, Silicon Valley. It made the national news.

This attempt has nothing to do with the instructor’s car or the Russian student or what he might do next, yet still seems to be part of the pattern he saw in his windshield, one he hadn’t noticed before but once he did has spread farther out into the world where other things can happen, its presence so pervasive, its logic so direct, so forceful and perhaps inescapable, yet a pattern of a filigree so fine, its design so unreasoned, that it may not matter what anyone does next or why.

The Nasdaq continues to fall, with no end in sight. The Valley talks about little else.

The Russian student continues to show up, in fact has not missed a day, still sits in the back corner, still doesn’t speak, and still hasn’t turned in any papers. No word from Security, but nothing else has happened yet. Perhaps he had his say with the car and was satisfied. Or maybe he is preparing for what he will do when the instructor flunks him, who will have no other choice. In the meantime, all the instructor can do is wait.

And wonder.

And think about the pattern.

But now the quarter is three-fourths over, and he is consumed in the process of teaching, the managing of the onslaught of words and the steering through their misdirections, so much so that it is difficult to think what any of them mean. The reading of texts, the divining their intentions, the following their suggestions, the reconstructing and testing their support, the seeing past their shortcomings and errant forays. The preparing for class to present the texts, plans that may or may not hit the mark, the talking after when they don’t. Whole weekends spent wading through his students’ papers, their half-hearted stabs, their serious plunges, their partial successes, their partial failures, their lapses from grammatical grace. Also the dealing with whatever the departments and divisions and administrations of his three schools give him to read and respond to, the maneuvering through their intentions, their falls from grace. On top of all this, the hours spent fighting traffic to get to each school on time. What most strains him more, however, is the effort needed in class to keep his students motivated at a time when they themselves are pressed by their other classes and whatever else is going on in their lives.

Every quarter has this phase, but winters are the hardest, when the continual rains depress spirits and bugs go around. This winter is even harder, and he can’t think of any local causes. A handful of students usually drop the first few weeks. So far he has lost eleven of thirty, several of them mid-quarter who were doing well, or well enough. With those who remain, discussion lags, time creeps. By the end of the two hour period the instructor is exhausted.

While it may look this way, the instructor knows the attitude they show is not resentment. He feels for them, and wishes there were some more considerate way they could learn that would not be so stressful. But they, he will come out of it, something will have been accomplished, and everyone will move on, as has happened every quarter for over sixteen years.

Yet nights, coming home from Hayward, crossing the San Mateo Bridge so many miles above dark waters, he still reflects on the day but now can only see his own doubts about his efforts. When he tries to look ahead, he can’t.

He has stayed at Monte Vista because the school is closest to home and part-time work has for the most part been assured. But he’ll never get a full-time job there or at any of the schools in the area. He’s known this for some time, but hasn’t allowed the fact to settle in. He applies every time there is an opening, but has never had an interview at Monte Vista and only one at one of the other schools where he’s taught.

The hiring committees’ reasoning must go something like this: If he is a part-timer there must be something wrong with him. Otherwise he wouldn’t be a part-timer. Similar arguments have been made in the past as to why the poor are poor. While they may not actually think that way, the results are still the same. He’s talked around, and the informal word at Monte Vista and elsewhere is that if a school doesn’t take a part-timer the first three or four years, odds are they never will. Monte Vista itself has only hired a few from the hundreds who have passed through the fourteen years he has been there.

He suspects he has run afoul of the many factions, which change from year to year and about whose existence he has been uncertain. And he has seen a succession of five chairs and three deans, each with his or her vision of what the school needs, each vision different, following the current trend, but in which he never seems to fit, all of whom must wonder why he hangs around. At any rate when there is an opening, the schools always get hundreds of applicants from whom to chose, fresh young faces, and this may be another problem, that he now appears to be too old.

Part-time employment is the same everywhere, and his only shot would be to apply all over the country and go wherever he could get a job. But he can’t leave. His wife has had her own school exigencies to contend with and has finally gotten permanent status, while his daughter has made friends and settled into school.

Sometimes he wonders why such obvious exploitation is tolerated, given the nature of his profession, but really knows better. The temptations of supply and demand, though not always voiced, work behind the scenes and when they appear are given other names. Silicon Valley itself, who prides itself in its flexible workforce, depends on contract labor, a trend that has caught on throughout.

But if he takes a global view, he knows he cannot complain. Others are much worse off in this country. He should be able to piece together a career and keep teaching in the years to come. He just won’t make as much. He does, however, wish he had a more stable base to stand on, at least the security of a stronger contract. His only lasts a quarter. And some benefits—retirement will be tricky. He has also begun to wonder how much longer he can keep up his load, its pace.

What he most needs this winter, though, is to restore some larger perspective that might help him orient himself so he can believe in what he is doing now and finish the quarter intact.

Because he has been looking farther out, and discovered his situation is nothing compared to what it might be in Russia. Like others, he stopped paying attention when the Soviet system fell, save to see the news clips on the McDonald’s and boutiques and nightlife in Moscow, the catching up with us. Nights, when wife and daughter are asleep, he has been staying up reading about what he has missed. The silence of the Russian student is ever on his mind, and he’s looking for a way to make him speak by trying to imagine life there himself, and, after a few books, wondering how he might survive.

There are gangs in Russia—gruppirovki. From what he’s read there seems to be nothing but, bottom to the top. With the Soviet rush to industrialization after World War II and the subsequent rural migration to the cities, they first appeared in the vast, sterile Soviet housing tracts, where, well armed and relentless, they continue to define their identity and harass those who do not accept it, claim territory and fight turf wars against rival gangs. The gangs diversified with the economic loosening up and took off in ’91 when it was decided to let the market rule. Heroin, gambling, protection rackets in the open markets, black markets. The black searchers, who scavenge the mass graves of Germans who fell on the eastern front, cashing in on Nazi insignia, a healthy trade.

Or they provide small businesses real protection—“roofs”—from other gangs, the only way they can do business. Or they man the ranks of the Mafiya, who have branched out into oil, banks, and real estate, controlling 40% of the Russian economy, according to one statistic. Or the ranks of the legitimate oligarchs, if this distinction can be made, who control most of the rest, both of whom, with privatization, have found ways to buy up state enterprises cheap so they can skim off the top and plunder assets, both of whom need protection as well as assassins for the ritual killing off of competition in the open, on busy streets. Sergei’s own city has become a center, earning the reputation of Banditsky Petersburg.

With the buying up and skimming, the fall in production by half, the flight of money and resources abroad, the crash in ’98. As for those who lack protection, two-thirds in poverty by one calculation, hyperinflation wiping out buying power and savings and pensions.

With the spread of gangs into the economy, the corruption of the government and police, the buying off, the looking the other way. And more killing. In Saint Petersburg Galina Starovoitova, a deputy in the Duma, was gunned down, three bullets to her head, one of six to suffer a similar fate. The investigation remains stalled; suspicions run in all directions, the government itself at the front. With the killing, the backing down by other deputies, the loss of hope for change. Starovoitova was a reformer, and reform’s last chance, some despaired.

All this time, the territorial wars in Chechnya, its violence, the retaliations, the losing sight of motives. The massacre of Chechen villagers at Aldy, the piling up of unidentified Russian soldiers in refrigerated boxcars, the mothers searching them to find their sons. On the home front, the soldiers returning, lost without their guns, looking for employment.

At least the instructor has a context for the Russian student’s behavior, given the life he must have had and the kinds of decisions he had to make, which helps him put aside what Sergei has done, though it does raise the level of his questions about whatever else he might do next.

What else can the English instructor conclude?

Causes are easy to isolate and define, but solutions are hard to imagine. What he has found to be essential is opaque.

He knows he has not read the whole story, that much about Russia and its people, in their favor, has gone unreported. Many qualifications are needed, as well as some foresight. Russia is in a period of transition that should not last forever. Order will reassert itself in one form or another, although, considering the text of history, this is not a given.

What he questions is why Russia has been allowed to fall so far so fast, so hard, why no one has come to help. The arguments before promoting economic shock therapy, the sudden dive into the free market touted by our advisors in Washington and embraced by those in Moscow, are as unconvincing as are patent the reasons after why it failed.

One thing he cannot do is repel in horror. Much of what he has read is familiar and comparisons are invited. We have fought disputed wars and had our own assassinations. Our own move to the market was rough, the effects of which still linger. And we have had our gangs, bottom to the top, and inequalities, and, of course, have suffered our own civil abuse, for example, what happened in Los Angeles in ’91. Still, what we have gone through pales before what Russia has endured.

But there is little solace and no insight provided in deciding our behavior is not as bad.

Much of his life the instructor listened to Cold War comparisons, decades of conversations pitting us against them, one ideology against the other. Now he realizes the debate is finally over, perhaps for good, but with what result? The only conclusion he can reach, when he considers what has happened in Russia and the way talk has gone here since, is that if the Cold War was a battle of ideas, no one won, but rather both sides have stopped thinking about what they are doing.

As for himself, instead of finding perspective he has lost it, and the only certain effect his night reading has had on him is that when he tries to sleep he feels exposed and unprotected.

Still, one can shore oneself up in this country and he is safe. What he most realizes, nights driving back from Hayward, trying to reflect, is how much teaching has absorbed him for so many years. What he most wonders is what else has happened that he has missed elsewhere in the world, and here, what else lies waiting, unseen, overlooked, or ignored, how far the pattern spreads.

Days in class, his greatest strain has been that he can’t persuade himself of the reasons behind what he is doing because for months he hasn’t found anywhere to ground them. Perhaps they slipped away without his knowing. Or maybe the reasons never were there, and he and others have been deceiving themselves all along.

He still puts on the impartial face and tries to charge it with conviction, but the emotion is not there. His only solution is to pretend there are reasons and see where this takes him. He can’t think of any other option. Yet still there is doubt, and the only way to counter it is to reinforce the impartial face. But his students continue to struggle with the texts and his instruction, maybe even suffer to some degree. They all look stressed and are losing whatever heart they have left. His only recourse is to reinforce the face more and call this conviction, but the more he reinforces the more he doubts, the more the class struggles and loses, the greater the strain inside him, the less he sees behind the mask. The English instructor feels he is a fraud.

The last half of the quarter he has had his students read Mike Rose’s Lives on the Boundary, a book that takes on the ongoing debate about our decline in literacy, why Johnny cannot read. Rose frames his argument in a democratic context, the changes in education the last years, the opening up of our colleges to others in our country who previously had been excluded, many of whom now sit in his class.

For their third paper, he took his cue from “Entering the Conversation,” the chapter where Rose discusses how he overcame his own obstacles while in college, getting through tough courses by being taught the terms of their disciplines, the major figures and their ways of thinking. The instructor asked his students to consider the same, but enter the conversation of some field that meant something to them, a possible career, a major, a side interest, a private desire. He wanted to give them a chance to think about something they cared about and bring them closer to it. The chapter went over their heads, but the papers were not bad.

For their last paper, coming up, he has asked them to summarize and respond to Rose’s major concepts. Throughout the book Rose redefines writing, what it is, how it should be taught, why we do it, and upon what it should be based. These ideas are what the instructor would like them to grasp, and he has invited them to disagree, if they are so inclined, or take Rose’s views one step farther by considering what they might mean to them. His first goal in this paper, as always, is neutral, to train them to grasp complex thought, then try to think beyond it.

The instructor is not hopeful. The terms of writing and education are unfamiliar, and Rose’s references to culture, high and low, past and present, look strange. Some of his analysis is rather thick. They have not been asked before to think about why they are in school or why they write or what writing is, nor see the point in asking such questions. Throughout the book Rose attempts an answer, that writing might empower them, and this is the instructor’s desire, that their efforts with his book might leave an impression, so that at least when they leave class they will think about and question the other texts they read in school, rather than just accept what they say and repeat it.

More, he would like them, later in life, not to believe just what they are told to believe, nor just do what they are told.

What he wishes most, and his strongest motivation, is to see what kind of world they might create if they were so taught.

His students do not believe him. The instructor cannot muster strength to change their minds because he has lost heart himself. The last weeks the hours in class pass even more slowly, all his energy going to walking them through the text, the students growing quieter and more withdrawn, the strain inside him tighter. He is afraid he will lose more students. They must not think the quarter will ever end.

Yet he has had success with Lives in the past, and it was well received. The problem may not just be the text’s ideas or terms or references, not just his students’ skepticism about what the instructor wants them to do. One day, while discussing a later chapter where Rose relates his own experience teaching Vietnam vets, he reads aloud two quotations that Rose once read to his students. One by Aimé Césaire,:

In the whole world no poor devil is lynched, no wretch is tortured, in whom I too am not degraded and murdered.

The other by Karl Jaspers:

There exists among men, because they are men, a solidarity through which each shares responsibility for every injustice and every wrong committed in the world.

And he asks his students the questions Rose invites.

How are the two passages similar?

How are they different?

What do they mean?

Not much response. They don’t understand the passages and he has to explain them both, word by word.

Or maybe they do understand, but just don’t believe them.

Or maybe their message is unfamiliar because they haven’t heard it before.

One night he falls into restless sleep that turns into a fitful dream of a circle of men surrounding another man in its center, the circle growing larger, spreading out in gray confusion, then contracting into sharp contrasts and tight precision, then spreading out again into confusion, the dream a moil of arms and legs thrusting, or recoiling, his perspective in the dream shifting back and forth without ever settling.

One moment he is moving in the circle.

The next he is Rodney King.

.

Exam week, several matters are resolved, bringing various types of relief, in varying degrees. Corrections are made accordingly.

Talking to a colleague, he learns he is not the only one who found a screw stuck in his tire. The school is refitting the gym and construction trucks have been trailing parts and debris throughout.

The windshield culprits are finally caught, high school kids skipping class, who live in the neighborhood nearby, where they cut a swath. Some wonder why they did it, given their parents’ economic standing. Others argue money is the cause.

The pipe bomber manages to find a way to hang himself before his trial is over. He leaves no note. Theories circulate once again, without conclusion.

And nineteen students show up for his exam Friday and all should pass.

Including the Russian student, who, with his exam, drops four papers on the instructor’s desk. Then he stares at him, as before, with a sneer.

“Thank you for your passion,” he says.

That the instructor can only read as sarcasm, but which he gladly takes.

Then the Russian student leaves.

That night, instead of turning in early—it has been a long week after a long quarter—he pulls out Sergei’s papers, not without apprehension. The instructor is still haunted by what he might yet have done, but didn’t, but which still may come out in words.

He reads them in the order given, in case there was an order intended. The first is his summary of the Cassidy essay. The paper is brief and choppy, but logically arranged, and shows the skeleton of Cassidy’s ideas, more completely and with greater precision than the papers by the other students. Obviously he is intelligent, though how much so the instructor cannot tell.

Just as obvious, he does not know English well, as his vocabulary is limited, though essentially correct, and there are many second language errors and oddities. He must still be thinking in Russian then translating when he writes. The instructor can feel the presence of the other language asserting its control. He probably rushed the paper to get the battle over quickly. Then again, he may have only gone where he felt safe, in which case the paper could have taken him a long time as he fought our syntax, the way we stack and suspend phrases and connect them to the body, and our words, their many shadings, all our idioms, the cells that give writing life. He must be much less confident speaking, which explains his silence in class.

He also shows familiarity with economics, perhaps other disciplines as well. But he seems detached from what he is saying as he reviews the many facets of California’s economy, the causes for its rise, Cassidy’s argument it would stay on top instead of fall once more, again because he is not close to our language.

Or perhaps he does not care. There may be a purpose in his distance, and it is not detachment the instructor feels, but skepticism, or opposition, or even distaste. Whichever the case, the way he writes approaches style. Though Sergei makes no judgment, as he was asked not to do in a summary, the short sentences fall with force and finality, like verdicts on our system. Or maybe against any system, and they fall bluntly, like decisive actions carried out, the style of a soldier—or a thug.

Still, the instructor’s reading of the Russian student begins to shift.

Next is the summary of and response to Lives on the Boundary, where he hopes to move a little closer into Sergei’s heart and mind, but is disappointed. His summary of Rose’s ideas is just as brief, though reveals the same reach, the same control. He follows implications and manages the critical passages, much better than the other students. His response is largely restatement, however, without exploration or personal thought. As in the Cassidy paper, his peremptory sentences march in step, yet their force moves in the direction of agreement and he seems to have genuine interest in education and society of some sort, their potential. The instructor senses he wants to go farther, but does not know what else to say. Or perhaps he does not know how to say it because he hasn’t yet found his voice, the modulating and proportioning needed to set the right curve between heart and mind, the texturing of words to make them stay awhile in our heads before we release them.

It is possible what the instructor saw all quarter as anger may only have been frustration, which may also be the reason the papers came in late.

But he still seems distant from what he is saying and stops short of any engagement. Behind his words the instructor can see the sneer, in his syntax sense further battle, maybe because he doubts not the truth or desirability of Rose’s ideas, but doesn’t believe they can be brought into effect. Because they are too ideal, too remote? Or because of the blockage of society, ours or his or any kind? The instructor cannot pin his politics down, if he has them.

Or is he fighting within himself, against what he finds there?

As he reads the paper the instructor’s own doubts about his teaching only deepen, inside and out.

But at least the Russian student put up a fight. And maybe he said all he thought needed to be said, the way he meant to say it. His words do last a moment after the instructor puts the paper down.

The third paper is the second assignment, “Redefine the California Dream,” where he most encouraged students to open up and take a chance, which no one else did, but Sergei does. Instead of discussing California, he talks about Saint Petersburg, instead of the Dream, the insomnia of the city’s white nights. Against sunny beaches and transparent skies above the Sierra, he sets the flat, gray waters of the Baltic beneath flat, gray Russian skies, like slate, like lead. Against a landscape of wealth and desire, a plain of oppression and isolation. Against the paradoxes of plenty, the paradoxes of nothing. It is as if he read Rawls’s essay and bounced off.

The paper itself is built of terse, separate parts without transition or connecting thought, no purpose ever directly stated, any implied intent escaping through all the gaps. He begins without introduction by quickly reviewing the city’s beginnings, which the instructor does not know. He wonders if Sergei did so for his benefit, if the paper was motivated in part by their disjointed conversation over a month ago, perhaps in reaction to an impression the instructor might have had, maybe to show he has read a bit and given it some thought. If the instructor is part of the audience, though, his part is small, and as he reads the paper he sees it disappear.

Saint Petersburg is a city built from scratch the early years of the eighteenth century as a fort against the Swedes and a center for the backward Russian sprawl, Peter the Great’s look to the future, to enlightenment.

Someone said Peter I wanted a window on Europe. Petersburg is not window but mirror framed with thousands of columns. Like all people who look in a mirror, he did not know what he saw.

The land was marsh, which had to be drained and reinforced with timber, divided by the branches of the Neva, whose banks had to be shored with stone, its currents bridged. Peter conscripted labor from across Russia and brought them in, often under forced march. Tens of thousands died of disease and exposure; the city rests on Russian forests and Russian bones. Tsar Peter saw no contradiction.

Still, it is beautiful city.

Then European architects were called in to bring Western vistas across the flat, open space, but created instead a low-lying architecture whose classical influence looks more stark and repetitive than proportioned, its ornament little questions, Sergei claims, lost between the water and the sky.

Dostoevsky called it the most artificial city in the world. Poet Joseph Brodsky said it is place where you can think clearly. Both are right.

Later the Industrial Revolution, later Lenin and his revolution, his architecture. But Lenin moved the capital to Moscow to get away from the Tsars, and, according to Sergei, not to look into the mirror.

Saint Petersburg is also a city prone to floods, one in 1824 that killed hundreds and injured thousands, the inspiration for Pushkin’s poem “The Bronze Horseman,” whose plot he reviews. Yevgeny, a poor clerk returning home at night in a storm, sees the home of his fiancé washed away by the flood’s destruction. Wandering in despair, he comes upon the bronze horseman, the statue of Peter the Great on rearing horse, his lifted arm pointing Russia the way. He curses the architect of the city and his creation; the statue comes to life and chases Yevgeny through the streets, breaking his spirit, lost to his death.

The storm is a storm. It doesn’t mean anything. Peter I is Peter I. It does not matter if statue comes alive or Yevgeny imagines this. What matters is he is afraid.

Sergei also notes Peter and he have about the same height, a comparison that makes the instructor double back from the direction he thought he was going. Gogol’s clerk of “The Overcoat” and Dostoevsky’s underground man also find their way into the paper, but the instructor is not sure who is looking back.

While he never mentions himself again, Sergei’s presence is apparent throughout, positioning the material and implying a relationship to it. But it isn’t clear if he is trying to locate himself in space and time or move outside of both, and the self the instructor attempts to posit takes on many opposing faces.

Appearing seemingly at random in the paper, poetic impressions of the city in its seasons, but which might prefigure an intellectual stance. He describes the white nights of summer, when it is darkness that is brief and faint, the persistence of pale light on the spectral facades of the buildings, the moment of reddish tint that remains in memory after the sun rises and full light is restored. He quotes Brodsky:

On such nights, it’s hard to fall asleep, because it’s too light and because any dream will be inferior to this reality.

Along with the impressions, strings of sentences of epigrammatic cast, left hanging in the white spaces of the paper:

What people call Russian soul is nonsense, but so is everything else.

Historical materialism makes no sense because there is no matter, nor forces, only ideas about matter and forces.

The people are not people.

Dialectical materialism is tautology. Dialectic is all there is.

There is no synthesis.

Synthesis does not matter.

History is series of deflections.

Capitalism is practice without ideas.

Communism is ideas without practice.

Gangsters have no ideas, but at least are honest. This should be respected.

Whose first effect is esthetic. Their implications are not pursued, but the sentences could be extended to construct a point of view. Then again, they could be used to disassemble one. Or they might only be ejections by a nihilist, setting himself apart from any.

Essays, it occurs to him, are fictions, in which writers efface themselves, pretending they are not there, perhaps even believing it. Ideas are an essay’s themes, used to produce the illusion of substance; facts are the details the story teller selects to give the impression of reality. Its plot is the progression of its argument, which, as in fiction, moves to the consummation of some desire, or the destruction of another.

But the instructor has no idea how the paper makes him feel, or what has been created or destroyed. Nor can he decide if Sergei rushed the paper just to get the words out, or instead spent much time placing them and paring down, then wonders about the difference. Yet however hard it is to locate the Russian student, he never leaves the paper, and what the instructor most thinks about, perhaps the paper’s strength, is what he most avoids.

The paper ends with the siege of Leningrad, some two and a half years of Nazi shelling and aerial bombing, of massive death, of hard winters endured with little food or heat.

The people of Leningrad did not survive because they hated Hitler or because they loved Soviet Union or even Leningrad. They survived because they did not want to die. Living is finding ways not to die.

Which is the thought the instructor takes into the final paper in the stack, “Entering the Conversation.” The remaining traces of his suspicion vanish when he learns Sergei is the son of doctors and is going to be one himself. What takes the place of his suspicion, however, is much more difficult to bear. The paper is a harsh read.

Instead of talking about the medical profession, he reviews the health system in Russia and the state of its health. Under the Soviets, the system was essentially free, available to most, and somewhat functional, though largely in controlling mass infectious diseases. If not good at treating individuals, it at least took care of the people. The system declined, however, as the economy stalled and state money kept going to defense. When the market took over in ’91, the system and its standards kept falling, the disease prevention program the first to go. Facilities remain underfunded and in need of much repair; advanced treatment is farther beyond the reach of most. State doctors, still underpaid and more overworked, have taken to prescribing drugs over treatment and prevention, the ailing clinics to charging fees, neither of which many patients can afford. Or to trying to treat without drugs even when needed, again because of the expense, and because many are not available. And some doctors are taking kickbacks from the pharmaceutical firms for their prescriptions, when they are. What is bad in Saint Petersburg gets worse farther out.

As for the country’s health now, he goes into the specifics. The return of infectious diseases—tuberculosis, diphtheria, cholera, polio, typhoid fever, and typhus. Surges in alcoholism, in heroin addiction, and, with the needles, hepatitis and AIDS, which the state denies. The slow and quick deaths from these. The quick deaths from cardiovascular collapses, five to six times higher than in the West. From violence in the streets, from the war, and from suicides, on the rise as well. The slow deaths from malnutrition and depression. Infant and birth mortality up, fertility down. In sum, a life expectancy for men at 57, a population in decline, more people dying than being born. WHO ranks Russian health 127th out of 192, Sergei flatly states.

The paper is still sparse, but much longer than the others. Yet he keeps the instructor moving start to finish as the clip of his sentences unloads in relentless progression. And he maintains control throughout, coldly logical in his categories, rigorous in his branching structure, and deadly precise in the details of his support. If this paper is skeletal, it is because a skeleton is what he shows.

Nowhere a note of outrage, or a slip into despair, or even a measured sympathetic response. The instructor tries to imagine faces, the looks of desperation and suffering, but cannot. Where Sergei is distant in the other papers, this one has been stripped of all emotion. There is no voice. The only effect his writing might have on a reader is to make him or her take a breath, which is what the instructor does.

Then again, distance may have been his emotion, and his voice.

While he breaks down and compares both systems before and after—their policies, their organizations, their hierarchies, their local parts, the bureaucracy and other problems running between bottom and top—what the paper most lacks is what was asked for in the assignment and what the material most cries for, analysis, in this case of cause and effect, along with some kind of assessment. Against the diseases of the social body the instructor discovered in his night reading, the Russian student has set those of bodies, and they are diseases of the spirit as well. The two are directly related. Connections should have been made, motives dissected, values raised and defended, and, finally and necessarily, judgment brought to bear.

Yet their absence is so glaring that it suggests intent. Perhaps he does not want to allow his readers to escape into obvious conclusions. Or perhaps what is obvious is not essential to his purpose. What he has accomplished is show a pattern, which he has seen closely, tracing it through all its cracks. But also he has contained it. What the instructor, as a reader, has accomplished is move through a pattern, and come out whole.

He takes another breath.

There is some brief biography at the end, but largely to credit sources. Much of his knowledge came firsthand from his parents, who still practice in the Kalininsky district, north of the city’s columned center, in a neighborhood of block housing and real estate scams and homeless, of closed military plants and alcoholics and unemployed, of children and teens working the streets. They have been working in the same clinic for over thirty years, through all the changes and all throughout the decline, in what Sergei calls “dumb plodding.” The rest he got from med school, Pavlov State, and his own reading, recent, while here. But he doesn’t have a degree because four years ago he dropped out. After that, he had what he calls a “nothing period,” then, last year, he left for California.

Again the instructor tries to place Sergei and answer questions left untouched. What, growing up, could he have seen in his parents’ faces as year after year, before and ever after, demoralized and wore them down? Was that what he reacted against in anger and led to his dropping out of school? And, or, was it what he saw on the streets of Saint Petersburg and gave in to, their urgency, their temptations, their traps? Or did he just wear down himself? What could he have done those years off, given his options? The instructor can only see three routes, violence or dissolution or despair.

His previous paper, however, suggests other options. As for his parents, “dumb” can mean silent, and “plodding” perseverance. They may have been exactly the words he intended, which best explain what he has come to understand about them. And about a “nothing period” nothing can be concluded. Nothing is nothing. The instructor should trust the writer’s assessment and leave alone what the writer does not provide. Besides, he has made enough wrong guesses about the Russian student this quarter.

The paper may have another purpose, which may also explain why it and the others were late. Sergei is not trying to take a stand but rather make a decision, because in the last sentence he says, in a few weeks, he is returning to Saint Petersburg to finish his degree, and plans to stay.

The English instructor, to the extent he is part of his audience, contemplates contrition for all his misinterpretation, which also may have surfaced in class throughout the quarter, but is certain the Russian student would only stare him down.

Late that night, still awake, he realizes that when he thanked him for his passion, he was serious.

.

.